ArticleJournal of arrhythmia2024
Characteristics of radiofrequency lesions in patients with symptomatic periesophageal vagal nerve injury after pulmonary vein isolation.
Article in Journal of arrhythmia, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- A case of acute acalculous cholecystitis after pulmonary vein isolation-novel phenotype of perioesophageal vagal nerve injury: a case report.European heart journal. Case reports · 2025Article
- How to demonstrate factors associated with peri-esophageal vagal nerve injury during catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation.Journal of arrhythmia · 2024Article
- Editorial to "Characteristics of radiofrequency lesions in patients with symptomatic periesophageal vagal nerve injury after pulmonary vein isolation".Journal of arrhythmia · 2024Article
- Characteristics of radiofrequency lesions in patients with symptomatic periesophageal vagal nerve injury after pulmonary vein isolation.Journal of arrhythmia · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Periesophageal vagal nerve injury (PNI) is an unpredictable and serious complication of atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation. We aimed to identify the factors associated with symptomatic PNI. Methods: This study included 1391 patients who underwent ablation index-guided pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) using the CARTO system. The target ablation index was set at 550, except for the left atrial (LA) posterior wall near the esophagus, where radiofrequency (RF) power and duration were limited. Ten patients (0.72%) were diagnosed with symptomatic PNI. We randomly selected 40 patients without PNI (1:4 ratio) matched based on age, sex, body mass index, LA diameter, type of AF, and esophageal location. We measured the shortest distance from the RF lesions to the esophagus (LED) and classified the RF lesions according to the LED into four groups: 0-5, 5-10, 10-15, and 15-20 mm. We conducted a comparative analysis of classified RF lesions between patients with PNI ( Results: The contact force at LED 0-5 mm was significantly higher in patients with PNI than in those without (14.6 ± 1.7 vs. 12.0 ± 2.9 g; Conclusions: The symptomatic PNI was significantly associated with a higher contact force near the esophagus. Strategies for regulating contact force near the esophagus may aid in the prevention of PNI.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.