ArticlePlant phenomics (Washington, D.C.)2024
DEKR-SPrior: An Efficient Bottom-Up Keypoint Detection Model for Accurate Pod Phenotyping in Soybean.
Article in Plant phenomics (Washington, D.C.), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Amodal Segmentation and Trait Extraction of On-Branch Soybean Pods with a Synthetic Dual-Mask Dataset.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- A keypoint-based method for detecting weed growth points in corn field environments.Plant phenomics (Washington, D.C.) · 2025Article
- RsegNet: An Advanced Methodology for Individual Rubber Tree Segmentation and Structural Parameter Extraction from UAV LiDAR Point Clouds.Plant phenomics (Washington, D.C.) · 2025Article
- Pod-pose : an efficient top-down keypoint detection model for fine-grained pod phenotyping in mature soybean.Plant methods · 2025Article
- PFLO: a high-throughput pose estimation model for field maize based on YOLO architecture.Plant methods · 2025Article
- A spontaneous keypoints connection algorithm for leafy plants skeletonization and phenotypes extraction.Frontiers in plant science · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The pod and seed counts are important yield-related traits in soybean. High-precision soybean breeders face the major challenge of accurately phenotyping the number of pods and seeds in a high-throughput manner. Recent advances in artificial intelligence, especially deep learning (DL) models, have provided new avenues for high-throughput phenotyping of crop traits with increased precision. However, the available DL models are less effective for phenotyping pods that are densely packed and overlap in in situ soybean plants; thus, accurate phenotyping of the number of pods and seeds in soybean plant is an important challenge. To address this challenge, the present study proposed a bottom-up model, DEKR-SPrior (disentangled keypoint regression with structural prior), for in situ soybean pod phenotyping, which considers soybean pods and seeds analogous to human people and joints, respectively. In particular, we designed a novel structural prior (SPrior) module that utilizes cosine similarity to improve feature discrimination, which is important for differentiating closely located seeds from highly similar seeds. To further enhance the accuracy of pod location, we cropped full-sized images into smaller and high-resolution subimages for analysis. The results on our image datasets revealed that DEKR-SPrior outperformed multiple bottom-up models, viz., Lightweight-OpenPose, OpenPose, HigherHRNet, and DEKR, reducing the mean absolute error from 25.81 (in the original DEKR) to 21.11 (in the DEKR-SPrior) in pod phenotyping. This paper demonstrated the great potential of DEKR-SPrior for plant phenotyping, and we hope that DEKR-SPrior will help future plant phenotyping.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.