Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38939739›Full record

ReviewHealth care science2023

CardioLabelNet: An uncertainty estimation using fuzzy for abnormalities detection in ECG.

Jyoti Mishra, Mahendra Tiwari

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Health care science, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Jyoti MishraDepartment of Electronics and Communication University of Allahabad Prayagraj India.ORCID 0000-0001-5146-6837
Mahendra TiwariDepartment of Electronics and Communication University of Allahabad Prayagraj India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Electrocardiography (ECG) abnormalities are evaluated through several automatic detection methods. Primarily, real-world ECG data are digital signals those are stored in the form of images in hospitals. Also, the existing automated detection technique eliminates the cardiac pattern that is abnormal and it is difficult to multiple abnormalities at some instances. To address those issues in this paper conventional ECG image automated techniques CardioLabelNet model is proposed. The proposed model incorporates two stages for image abnormality detection. At first fuzzy membership is performed in the image for computation of uncertainty. In second stage, classification is performed for computation of abnormal activity. The proposed CardioLabelNet collect ECG image data set for the uncertainty estimation while taking the account of various image classes which includes the global and local entropy of image pixels. For each waveform, uncertainties are calculated on the basis of global entropy. The computation of uncertainty in the images is performed with the fuzzy membership function. The spatial likelihood estimation of a fuzzy weighted membership function is used to calculate local entropy. Upon completion of fuzzification, classification is performed for the detection of normal and abnormal patterns in the ECG signal images. Through integration of stacked architecture model classification is performed for ECG images. The proffered algorithm performance is calculated in terms of accuracy for segmentation, Dice similarity coefficient, and partition entropy. Additionally, classification parameters accuracy sensitivity, specificity, and AUC are evaluated. The proposed approach outperforms the existing methodology, according to the results of a comparative analysis.

Indexed as

classificationECGentropyfuzzyimage pixelwaveform

Identifiers

PMID38939739
PMCPMC11080742

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.