Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38939700›Full record

ArticleJACC. Advances2022

Priorities and Understanding of Pregnancy Among Women With Congenital Heart Disease: A Mixed-Methods Study.

Nicole Herrick, Tala Al-Rousan, Carla Rodriguez, Ji Hae Lee, Anne Marie Valente, Jordan Stone, Gladys Ramos, Bendelyn Asante-Boateng, Howaida El-Said, Maria Moceri-Casas and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JACC. Advances, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Congenital uterine anomalies and congenital heart disease: An underappreciated association?International journal of cardiology. Congenital heart disease · 2025
    Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Nicole HerrickAdult Congenital Heart Disease Program, Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, University of California-San Diego, San Diego, California, USA.
Tala Al-RousanHerbert Wertheim School of Public Health and Human Longevity, University of California-San Diego, San Diego, California, USA.
Carla RodriguezDivision of Cardiology, Department of Cardiology, Boston Children's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Ji Hae LeeDivision of Cardiology, Department of Cardiology, Boston Children's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Anne Marie ValenteDivision of Cardiology, Department of Cardiology, Boston Children's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Jordan StoneReproductive Medicine Department, University of California-San Diego, San Diego, California, USA.
Gladys RamosReproductive Medicine Department, University of California-San Diego, San Diego, California, USA.
Bendelyn Asante-BoatengAdult Congenital Heart Disease Program, Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, University of California-San Diego, San Diego, California, USA.
Howaida El-SaidDivision of Pediatric Cardiology, Rady Children's Hospital and UC San Diego School of Medicine, San Diego, California, USA.
Maria Moceri-CasasAdult Congenital Heart Disease Program, Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, University of California-San Diego, San Diego, California, USA.
Laith AlshawabkehAdult Congenital Heart Disease Program, Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, University of California-San Diego, San Diego, California, USA.

Funding

RESEARCH METHODS IN PEDIATRICS HEART DISEASET32HL007572 · NHLBI · CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL BOSTON · PI Sarah D DE FERRANTI, Jane W. Newburger · 1985 to 2026
$13.0M
NHLBI NIH HHS T32 HL007572
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Many women with congenital heart disease (CHD) desire safe and successful pregnancies, but a significant proportion does not seek prepregnancy counseling. Objectives: This study aims to distinguish the personal priorities and perceptions about pregnancy in this growing population. Methods: Women aged 18 to 50 years with CHD were enrolled from 2 sites. Using a mixed-methods approach (Q-methodology), 179 participants sorted 23 statements representing a collection of views on pregnancy using priority forced ranking along a scale from "strongly agree" to "strongly disagree." Results: Majority of women were between 25 and 29 years of age, had moderate or severely complex CHD, and were married. Five unique group identities were elucidated from patient responses. Group 1 was centered around a strong desire to start a family. Women in group 2 had significant anxiety, and their psychological wellbeing interfered with their decision to start a family. Women in group 3 were concerned about premature death; if they do have kids, they want to be alive to see them grow old. Women in group 4 had strong objections to termination. Group 5 valued health care engagement. Group identities were unrelated to CHD complexity and demographic factors such as age and marital status. Six differentiating statements were identified that help distinguish which group a woman aligns with. Conclusions: Women with CHD have diverse priorities and values relating to pregnancy and heart disease. This study used a mixed-methods approach to provide a framework identifying several domains for targeted prepregnancy counseling in women with CHD.

Indexed as

adult congenital heart diseasecardio-obstetricsmixed-methods researchpregnancy and heart disease

Identifiers

PMID38939700
PMCPMC11198376

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.