ReviewJACC. Advances2024
The Role of the Clinical Psychologist in the Care of Adults With Cardiovascular Disease.
Review in JACC. Advances, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed.
- The Information Needs and Experiences of Cardiac Implantable Electronic Device Caregivers: A Qualitative Analysis of Social Media Data.Journal of clinical psychology in medical settings · 2026Article
- Integrated Specialty Care: A Review of the Current State.Current psychiatry reports · 2026Review
- Longitudinal Associations of Cumulative Depression Burden With Cardiovascular Diseases and All-Cause Death Among Middle-Aged and Older Population: Evidence From 2 Nationwide Cohort Studies.Journal of the American Heart Association · 2026Article
- Bridging the Gap: Multidisciplinary Decision Making to Address Systemic Barriers in Cardiovascular Care.Current cardiology reports · 2026Review
- Role of Depression and Anxiety in Peripheral Artery Disease: Correlates, Outcomes, and Considerations for Treatment.Arteriosclerosis, thrombosis, and vascular biology · 2026Review
- Mental Health of Psychologists During a Period of Cumulative Crises in Lebanon: The Predictive Role of Self-Esteem.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Post-Myocardial Infarction Psychological Distress: A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association.Circulation · 2025Review
- Brief Mindfulness-Based Cognitive Therapy in Women With Myocardial Infarction: Results of a Multicenter Randomized Controlled Trial.JACC. Advances · 2025Article
- Reply: Training in the Care of the Heart and Mind: Engaging Cardiology Fellows and Psychology Trainees.JACC. Advances · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Cardiovascular disease (CVD) is on the rise globally and, along with mental health conditions, will represent the largest public health burden, especially in a world impacted by climate change. Behavior, psychological mechanisms, and CVD are closely correlated. Evidence-based psychological interventions targeting behavior and psychological mechanisms exist across the CVD spectrum. This statement proposes the development of a subspecialty "cardiovascular psychology" to develop integrated pathways of behavioral care delivered to CVD populations. Scope of practice is discussed as it relates to diagnosing and treating comorbid health disorders, behavioral change interventions, pain management, lifestyle and wellbeing, neuropsychological assessment, and cognitive rehabilitation. An agenda on reforms for financials, training pathways, and diversification of the workforce is presented. Finally, normalizing the integration of behavioral health as part of CVD treatment is a shared responsibility across professional organizations and the community to realize value-based CVD care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.