ArticleJACC. Advances2023
Multisite Pain and Myocardial Infarction and Stroke: A Prospective Cohort and Mendelian Randomization Analysis.
Article in JACC. Advances, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Association of musculoskeletal pain with incidence and recurrence of cardiovascular disease: a longitudinal cohort in China.BMC public health · 2026Article
- Chronic pain: a modifiable target to reduce perioperative cardiovascular morbidity.British journal of anaesthesia · 2025Article
- Associations between endogenous sex hormones and multisite chronic musculoskeletal pain.British journal of anaesthesia · 2025Article
- Associations Between Lifetime Histories of Iron Deficiency, Anxiety, Depression and Multiple Pain Conditions: An Observational Study Using a Large-Scale National Database.Journal of pain research · 2025Article
- Association between pain interference and motoric cognitive risk syndrome in older adults: a population-based cohort study.BMC geriatrics · 2024Article
- Chronic Pain at Multiple Sites Increases Myocardial Infarction: If So, Why?JACC. Advances · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Whether individuals with multisite pain had a higher risk of cardiovascular diseases is unclear. Objectives: The purpose of this study was to investigate the longitudinal association of pain in multiple sites with incident myocardial infarction (MI) and stroke, and to disentangle the genetic causality of these associations. Methods: A total of 281,760 participants (mean age: 56.3 years) who had no MI and stroke at baseline from UK Biobank study were included. Data on pain in the hip, knee, back and neck/shoulder, or 'all over the body' were collected. Chronic pain was defined if pain had lasted for ≥3 months. MI and stroke events were determined from hospital admission records and death registries. Cox regression and 2-sample Mendelian randomization were used for the analyses. Results: During a median follow-up of 11.9 years, 4,854 had a first MI and 2,827 had a first stroke. In multivariable analyses, greater number of painful sites was dose-responsively associated with higher risks of incident MI and stroke, with a higher risk among participants with pain 'all over the body' (MI: HR: 1.65, 95% CI: 1.32-2.07; stroke: HR: 1.44, 95% CI: 1.13-1.85). Similar trends and associations were observed in those with chronic pain. Two-sample Mendelian randomization results supported a causal effect of multisite pain on MI risk, but not vice versa. No causal association was found between multisite pain and stroke risk. Conclusions: Pain in multiple sites causally increases the risk of MI, highlighting that pain should be considered when assessing individuals' MI risk, and pain treatment and management may prevent MI risk.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.