ArticleLeukemia research reports2024
Central nervous system relapse after combination therapy including polatuzumab vedotin in patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma.
Article in Leukemia research reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Real-world use of polatuzumab vedotin combined with bendamustine and rituximab for patients with relapsed or refractory large B-cell lymphoma.The Korean journal of internal medicine · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Preventing central nervous system (CNS) relapse is a major challenge in the treatment of diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL). However, no previous studies have examined the efficacy of polatuzumab vedotin (PV)-containing regimens in preventing CNS relapse in patients with DLBCL. Here, we report two cases of CNS relapse after PV-containing chemotherapy for DLBCL. CNS relapse developed during combination therapy with PV, bendamustine, and rituximab (PV-BR) in one patient and six months after PV-BR in the other patient. PV-containing chemotherapy may be ineffective as a prophylaxis against CNS relapse; therefore, additional strategies for preventing CNS relapse in DLBCL patients are required.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.