ArticleJACC. Advances2022
Prognostic Value of the H
Article in JACC. Advances, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Hemodynamics of Exercise-Induced Hypertension and Relationship to Outcomes in Adults With Coarctation of the Aorta.Circulation. Heart failure · 2025Article
- Striving for Improved Prognostication in Adults With Repaired Aortic Coarctation: Utility of the HJACC. Advances · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Risk stratification is challenging in adults with repaired coarctation of aorta (COA) because of the complex interaction of multiple hemodynamic factors and differences in left ventricular adaptation to these factors. The H Objectives: The purpose of this study was to assess the prognostic role of the H Methods: This is a retrospective cohort study of adults with repaired COA at the Mayo Clinic (2003-2019). The H Results: We identified 712 patients (age 33 years [range 21-45 years]; 419 [59%] males). The baseline H Conclusions: These results suggest that the H
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.