Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38939447›Full record

ArticleJACC. Advances2023

Automated Echocardiographic Detection of Heart Failure With Preserved Ejection Fraction Using Artificial Intelligence.

Ashley P Akerman, Mihaela Porumb, Christopher G Scott, Arian Beqiri, Agisilaos Chartsias, Alexander J Ryu, William Hawkes, Geoffrey D Huntley, Ayana Z Arystan, Garvan C Kane and 9 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JACC. Advances, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 56 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
56citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

56 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

19 authors.

Ashley P AkermanUltromics Ltd, Oxford, United Kingdom.
Mihaela PorumbUltromics Ltd, Oxford, United Kingdom.
Christopher G ScottDepartment of Quantitative Health Sciences, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA.
Arian BeqiriUltromics Ltd, Oxford, United Kingdom.
Agisilaos ChartsiasUltromics Ltd, Oxford, United Kingdom.
Alexander J RyuDivision of Hospital Internal Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA.
William HawkesUltromics Ltd, Oxford, United Kingdom.
Geoffrey D HuntleyDepartment of Cardiovascular Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA.
Ayana Z ArystanDepartment of Cardiovascular Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA.
Garvan C KaneDepartment of Cardiovascular Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA.
Sorin V PislaruDepartment of Cardiovascular Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA.
Francisco Lopez-JimenezDepartment of Cardiovascular Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA.
Alberto GomezUltromics Ltd, Oxford, United Kingdom.
Rizwan SarwarUltromics Ltd, Oxford, United Kingdom.
Jamie O'DriscollUltromics Ltd, Oxford, United Kingdom.
Paul LeesonUltromics Ltd, Oxford, United Kingdom.
Ross UptonUltromics Ltd, Oxford, United Kingdom.
Gary WoodwardUltromics Ltd, Oxford, United Kingdom.
Patricia A PellikkaDepartment of Cardiovascular Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Detection of heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) involves integration of multiple imaging and clinical features which are often discordant or indeterminate. Objectives: The authors applied artificial intelligence (AI) to analyze a single apical 4-chamber transthoracic echocardiogram video clip to detect HFpEF. Methods: A 3-dimensional convolutional neural network was developed and trained on apical 4-chamber video clips to classify patients with HFpEF (diagnosis of heart failure, ejection fraction ≥50%, and echocardiographic evidence of increased filling pressure; cases) vs without HFpEF (ejection fraction ≥50%, no diagnosis of heart failure, normal filling pressure; controls). Model outputs were classified as HFpEF, no HFpEF, or nondiagnostic (high uncertainty). Performance was assessed in an independent multisite data set and compared to previously validated clinical scores. Results: Training and validation included 2,971 cases and 3,785 controls (validation holdout, 16.8% patients), and demonstrated excellent discrimination (area under receiver-operating characteristic curve: 0.97 [95% CI: 0.96-0.97] and 0.95 [95% CI: 0.93-0.96] in training and validation, respectively). In independent testing (646 cases, 638 controls), 94 (7.3%) were nondiagnostic; sensitivity (87.8%; 95% CI: 84.5%-90.9%) and specificity (81.9%; 95% CI: 78.2%-85.6%) were maintained in clinically relevant subgroups, with high repeatability and reproducibility. Of 701 and 776 indeterminate outputs from the Heart Failure Association-Pretest Assessment, Echocardiographic and Natriuretic Peptide Score, Functional Testing (HFA-PEFF), and Final Etiology and Heavy, Hypertensive, Atrial Fibrillation, Pulmonary Hypertension, Elder, and Filling Pressure (H2FPEF) scores, the AI HFpEF model correctly reclassified 73.5% and 73.6%, respectively. During follow-up (median: 2.3 [IQR: 0.5-5.6] years), 444 (34.6%) patients died; mortality was higher in patients classified as HFpEF by AI (HR: 1.9 [95% CI: 1.5-2.4]). Conclusions: An AI HFpEF model based on a single, routinely acquired echocardiographic video demonstrated excellent discrimination of patients with vs without HFpEF, more often than clinical scores, and identified patients with higher mortality.

Indexed as

diastolic functionechocardiographyheart failureimagingmachine learning

Identifiers

PMID38939447
PMCPMC11198161

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.