Porcine cytomegalovirus in xenotransplantation: The new frontier in human transplantation?

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

1. Genetically engineered porcine liver: a new era in transplantation.International journal of surgery (London, England) · 2026
   Article
2. First Report of Porcine Bocavirus and Porcine Cytomegalovirus in Croatian ASF-Negative Wild Boar Populations.Viruses · 2026
   Article
3. The First Clinical Renal Xenotransplantation Study (EXPAND): Evaluating Safety, Function, and Zoonotic Risks.Health care science · 2025
   Article
4. Targeted Integration of siRNA against Porcine Cytomegalovirus (PCMV) Enhances the Resistance of Porcine Cells to PCMV.Microorganisms · 2024
   Article

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

Authors and funding

1 author.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as