ArticleFrontiers in oncology2024
Multiparametric MRI-based radiomics approach with deep transfer learning for preoperative prediction of Ki-67 status in sinonasal squamous cell carcinoma.
Article in Frontiers in oncology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Machine learning-based clinical-radiomics model for predicting recurrence risk after radical surgery in sinonasal squamous cell carcinoma: a preliminary 2-year follow-up study.BMC medical imaging · 2025Article
- Review
- Deep learning using nasal endoscopy and T2-weighted MRI for prediction of sinonasal inverted papilloma-associated squamous cell carcinoma: an exploratory study.European radiology experimental · 2025Article
- Constructing a risk screen for attention difficulty in U.S. adults using six machine learning methods.Frontiers in artificial intelligence · 2025Article
- Value of radiomics and deep learning feature fusion models based on dce-mri in distinguishing sinonasal squamous cell carcinoma from lymphoma.Frontiers in oncology · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: Based on comparison of different machine learning (ML) models, we developed the model that integrates traditional hand-crafted (HC) features and ResNet50 network-based deep transfer learning (DTL) features from multiparametric MRI to predict Ki-67 status in sinonasal squamous cell carcinoma (SNSCC). Methods: Two hundred thirty-one SNSCC patients were retrospectively reviewed [training cohort (n = 185), test cohort (n = 46)]. Pathological grade, clinical, and MRI characteristics were analyzed to choose the independent predictor. HC and DTL radiomics features were extracted from fat-saturated T2-weighted imaging, contrast-enhanced T1-weighted imaging, and apparent diffusion coefficient map. Then, HC and DTL features were fused to formulate the deep learning-based radiomics (DLR) features. After feature selection and radiomics signature (RS) building, we compared the predictive ability of RS-HC, RS-DTL, and RS-DLR. Results: No independent predictors were found based on pathological, clinical, and MRI characteristics. After feature selection, 42 HC and 10 DTL radiomics features were retained. The support vector machine (SVM), LightGBM, and ExtraTrees (ET) were the best classifier for RS-HC, RS-DTL, and RS-DLR. In the training cohort, the predictive ability of RS-DLR was significantly better than those of RS-DTL and RS-HC (p< 0.050); in the test set, the area under curve (AUC) of RS-DLR (AUC = 0.817) was also the highest, but there was no significant difference of the performance between DLR-RS and HC-RS. Conclusions: Both the HC and DLR model showed favorable predictive efficacy for Ki-67 expression in patients with SNSCC. Especially, the RS-DLR model represented an opportunity to advance the prediction ability.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.