Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38939335›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in oncology2024

Different MRI-based radiomics models for differentiating misdiagnosed or ambiguous pleomorphic adenoma and Warthin tumor of the parotid gland: a multicenter study.

Jing Yang, Qiu Bi, Yiren Jin, Yong Yang, Ji Du, Hongjiang Zhang, Kunhua Wu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in oncology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Observational
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Jing Yang *Department of MRI, The First People's Hospital of Yunnan Province, The Affiliated Hospital of Kunming University of Science and Technology, Kunming, Yunnan, China.
Qiu Bi *Department of MRI, The First People's Hospital of Yunnan Province, The Affiliated Hospital of Kunming University of Science and Technology, Kunming, Yunnan, China.
Yiren JinDepartment of Radiation, The Cancer Hospital of Yunnan Province, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Kunming Medical University, Kunming, Yunnan, China.
Yong YangDepartment of MRI, The First People's Hospital of Yunnan Province, The Affiliated Hospital of Kunming University of Science and Technology, Kunming, Yunnan, China.
Ji DuDepartment of MRI, The First People's Hospital of Yunnan Province, The Affiliated Hospital of Kunming University of Science and Technology, Kunming, Yunnan, China.
Hongjiang Zhang *Department of MRI, The First People's Hospital of Yunnan Province, The Affiliated Hospital of Kunming University of Science and Technology, Kunming, Yunnan, China.
Kunhua Wu *Department of MRI, The First People's Hospital of Yunnan Province, The Affiliated Hospital of Kunming University of Science and Technology, Kunming, Yunnan, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: To evaluate the effectiveness of MRI-based radiomics models in distinguishing between Warthin tumors (WT) and misdiagnosed or ambiguous pleomorphic adenoma (PA). Methods: Data of patients with PA and WT from two centers were collected. MR images were used to extract radiomic features. The optimal radiomics model was found by running nine machine learning algorithms after feature reduction and selection. To create a clinical model, univariate logistic regression (LR) analysis and multivariate LR were used. The independent clinical predictors and radiomics were combined to create a nomogram. Two integrated models were constructed by the ensemble and stacking algorithms respectively based on the clinical model and the optimal radiomics model. The models' performance was evaluated using the area under the curve (AUC). Results: There were 149 patients included in all. Gender, age, and smoking of patients were independent clinical predictors. With the greatest average AUC (0.896) and accuracy (0.839) in validation groups, the LR model was the optimal radiomics model. In the average validation group, the radiomics model based on LR did not have a higher AUC (0.795) than the clinical model (AUC = 0.909). The nomogram (AUC = 0.953) outperformed the radiomics model in terms of discrimination performance. The nomogram in the average validation group had a highest AUC than the stacking model (0.914) or ensemble model (0.798). Conclusion: Misdiagnosed or ambiguous PA and WT can be non-invasively distinguished using MRI-based radiomics models. The nomogram exhibited excellent and stable diagnostic performance. In daily work, it is necessary to combine with clinical parameters for distinguishing between PA and WT.

Indexed as

MRInomogramparotid glandpleomorphic adenomaradiomicsWarthin tumor

Identifiers

PMID38939335
PMCPMC11208325

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.