ArticleJACC. Advances2022
Cumulative In-Hospital Costs Associated With Single-Ventricle Palliation.
Article in JACC. Advances, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- A Comparison of Ductal Stenting and Surgical Shunts for Infants with Duct-Dependent Pulmonary Blood Flow: The Impact of Single Versus Biventricular Repair Pathways on Outcomes.Pediatric cardiology · 2026Article
- Evaluating Hospital Resource Utilization for Hypoplastic Left Heart Syndrome Through Linkage of a Clinical Registry and an Administrative Database.Pediatric cardiology · 2026Article
- Cost Containment in the Single Ventricle Population.JACC. Advances · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
19 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Background: In the SVR (Single Ventricle Reconstruction) Trial, 1-year survival in recipients of right ventricle to pulmonary artery shunts (RVPAS) was superior to that in those receiving modified Blalock-Taussig-Thomas shunts (MBTTS), but not in subsequent follow-up. Cost analysis is an expedient means of evaluating value and morbidity. Objectives: The purpose of this study was to evaluate differences in cumulative hospital costs between RVPAS and MBTTS. Methods: Clinical data from SVR and costs from Pediatric Health Information Systems database were combined. Cumulative hospital costs and cost-per-day-alive were compared serially at 1, 3, and 5 years between RVPAS and MBTTS. Potential associations between patient-level factors and cost were explored with multivariable models. Results: In total, 303 participants (55% of the SVR cohort) from 9 of 15 sites were studied (48% MBTTS). Observed total costs at 1 year were lower for MBTTS ($701,260 ± 442,081) than those for RVPAS ($804,062 ± 615,068), a difference that was not statistically significant ( Conclusions: Total costs do not differ significantly between MBTTS and RVPAS. The magnitude of longitudinal costs underscores the importance of efforts to improve outcomes in this vulnerable population.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.