Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38939283›Full record

ArticleCureus2024

Differences in Volatile Organic Compounds Between Concussed and Non-concussed Division I Athletes.

Allyn Abadie, Ian McKeag, Dan Springer, Matthew H Hale, José R Fernández

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Allyn AbadieDepartment of Nutrition Sciences, University of Alabama Birmingham, Birmingham, USA.
Ian McKeagDepartment of Family and Community Medicine, University of Alabama at Birmingham School of Medicine, Birmingham, USA.
Dan SpringerDepartment of Athletics, University of Alabama Birmingham, Birmingham, USA.
Matthew H HaleDepartment of Family and Community Medicine, University of Alabama at Birmingham School of Medicine, Birmingham, USA.
José R FernándezDepartment of Nutrition Sciences, University of Alabama Birmingham, Birmingham, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction Diagnosing a concussion is challenging because of complex and variable symptoms. Establishing a viable biomarker of injury may rely on physiologic measurements rather than symptomology. Volatile organic compounds (VOCs) such as breath acetone have been identified as potential physiological markers that can capture changes in the utilization of energy substrates post-concussion. Here, we aimed to explore whether differences in VOCs exist between concussed and non-concussed athletes at the initial and later stages of injury recovery. Methods Six (N=6) non-concussed athletes were enrolled as control participants prior to the competitive season. Control participants' breath acetone, heart rate, and anthropometric measures were obtained at rest and throughout a single exercise challenge by breathalyzer. Six (N=6) athletes diagnosed with concussion during the competitive season had breath acetone measured daily until cleared to return to activity or approximately four weeks following enrollment where they participated in an exit exercise challenge having breath acetone, heart rate, and anthropometric measures obtained. Comparisons were made between at-rest measures of concussed and non-concussed participants at multiple time points during the recovery period. Paired t-test comparisons with individuals serving as their own control were used to determine individual differences in recovery. Visual graphs were used to demonstrate differences in obtained measures amongst individuals and between groups during the exercise challenges. Results Results demonstrated statistically significant differences in breath acetone between concussed and control participants when the highest day measured during the first week of concussion was compared to the control participant's resting values (P=0.017). Additionally, when the concussed participants served as their own control and their highest measured day of the first week post-concussion was compared to values when cleared to return to activity or at 26 days post-concussion, there was a significant difference in breath acetone (P=0.028). Comparing breath acetone during exercise between non-concussed and cleared concussed participants or four weeks post-injury, demonstrated no significant differences throughout the challenge or at rest prior. Visual graph comparisons in a single participant before and after concussion suggest differences may appear following exercise during the recovery period. Discussion These results suggest VOCs, particularly breath acetone, have the potential to serve as diagnostic markers of concussion. However, longitudinal research within larger cohorts and with equipment able to expel VOCs other than acetone from measures are needed to make informed recommendations.

Indexed as

breathbreath acetoneconcussion recoveryketonesports related concussiontramatic brain injury

Identifiers

PMID38939283
PMCPMC11210574

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.