ArticleCureus2024
The Clinical Profile of Newly Diagnosed Acute Myeloid Leukemia at a Tertiary Care Center in South India: A Cross-Sectional Study.
Article in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background and objective Acute myeloid leukemia (AML) is a heterogeneous and aggressive blood malignancy prevalent among both children and adults, accounting for a significant proportion of acute leukemia cases worldwide. Our study aimed to shed light on the demographic and clinical profile and risk stratification of newly diagnosed AML cases at a tertiary care government hospital in South India. Methods We conducted a cross-sectional study involving 221 patients with AML in the Department of Clinical Hematology, Rajiv Gandhi Government General Hospital and Madras Medical College, Chennai, Tamil Nadu from January 2020 to December 2022. All data were collected from the hospital database of patients' medical records. A thorough analysis of clinical history, comorbidities, laboratories, risk stratification, and chemotherapy regimen was performed. The patients included in the study were newly diagnosed cases of AML over the age of 13 years, and we excluded all the relapsed cases. Results The highest proportion of patients were in the age group of 41-50 years (22.2%), and there was a significant male predominance (55.7%) in the cohort. Occupationwise, 31% of the study population were farmers, followed by housewives (16.3%). While no identifiable risk factors for AML were found in 191 cases (86.4%), 4.1% had undergone previous chemotherapy, and 3.6% had myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS). Hyperuricemia was noted in 50 cases (22.6%) while 8.6% had tumor lysis syndrome (TLS). About 53.8% of cases fell in the intermediate risk category of AML. Standard induction chemotherapy was administered in 87.3% of cases of AML. Conclusions Gaining awareness and knowledge about the regional demographic data and clinical presentation of AML will aid in the early detection, prompt referral, and initiation of treatment, thereby further improving patient outcomes in the era of targeted therapy and hematopoietic stem cell transplantation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.