Constructing an effective evaluation system to identify doctors' research capabilities.

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

1. Beijing Roundtable Addresses Research Integrity's Role in Advancing Open Science.Health care science · 2026
   Article
2. Potential limiting factor on engaged research: Academic evaluation systems.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
   Article
3. Constructing an effective evaluation system to identify doctors' research capabilities.Health care science · 2024
   Article
4. Developing a Delphi-Consensus Evaluation Framework for Clinical Research Training: A Chinese Model With Global Implications.Journal of medical education and curricular development
   Article

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

Authors and funding

1 author.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as