ReviewJACC. Advances2023
The Multidisciplinary Heart Team in Cardiovascular Medicine: Current Role and Future Challenges.
Review in JACC. Advances, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 57 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
57 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Multidisciplinary team approach to pelvic floor disorders: A systematic review.Biomedical journal · 2026Pooled it
- Barriers and Facilitators in Implementing Clinical Practice Guidelines Among Nurses in Emergency Departments and Critical Care Units: A Systematic Review.Journal of clinical nursing · 2026Pooled it
- Cardiovascular mortality in people with cancer compared to the general population: A systematic review and meta-analysis.Cancer medicine · 2024Pooled it
- Surviving or Thriving? Tenets of Shared Decision-Making in Communicating Perioperative Risk Prior to High-Risk Cardiac Surgery.Interdisciplinary cardiovascular and thoracic surgery · 2026Article
- The 'CIED Team' Approach to Device-Related Complications.JACC. Case reports · 2026Article
- The End of Silo Medicine: A Case for Disease-Centered Subspecialization.Journal of evaluation in clinical practice · 2026Article
- Surgical Outcomes in Adolescent and Adult Congenital Heart Disease: Identifying Predictors of Major Adverse Events.Pediatric cardiology · 2026Article
- Consensus and disparities in perspectives on congenital heart disease management between interventional cardiologists and cardiac surgeons in China.JTCVS open · 2026Article
- Rebuilding life after heart valve surgery: The VALCAR(E)_QoL study on rehabilitation and quality of life.MethodsX · 2026Article
- Bridging the Gap: Multidisciplinary Decision Making to Address Systemic Barriers in Cardiovascular Care.Current cardiology reports · 2026Review
- Left ventricular assist devices and right heart dysfunction: a review of impact mechanisms, evaluation methods, and prevention and management.Journal of cardiothoracic surgery · 2026Review
- Pathways to the Quintuple Aim: The Role of Advanced Practice Clinicians in Valvular Heart Disease.JACC. Advances · 2026Article
- Clinical Profiles and Prognostic Patterns in Critically Ill Cardiac Patients Requiring Invasive Mechanical Ventilation: A Five-Year Retrospective Cohort Study.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Review
- Primary and Secondary Prevention of Ischemic Stroke in Elderly Patients with Cardiovascular Disease: The Role of Frailty and Care Pathways.Neurology international · 2026Review
- Observational
- Reshaping the cardiovascular continuum in the management of arterial and venous cardiovascular disease: a narrative review.Journal of comparative effectiveness research · 2026Review
- Physiologic Pacing in Heart Failure.The New England journal of medicine · 2026Review
- Zero-fluoroscopy catheter ablation for arrhythmias in pregnancy: validation of a standardized approach with 5-year follow-up.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2026Article
- A case report of sinus node-sparing hybrid ablation for refractory sinus tachycardia following cardioneuroablation for sinus node dysfunction.BMC cardiovascular disorders · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
24 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Cardiovascular multidisciplinary heart teams (MDHTs) have evolved significantly over the past decade. These teams play a central role in the treatment of a wide array of cardiovascular diseases affecting interventional cardiology, cardiac surgery, interventional imaging, advanced heart failure, adult congenital heart disease, cardio-oncology, and cardio-obstetrics. To meet the specific needs of both patients and heart programs, the composition and function of cardiovascular MDHTs have had to adapt and evolve. Although lessons have been learned from multidisciplinary cancer care, best practices for the operation of cardiovascular MDHTs have yet to be defined, and the evidence base supporting their effectiveness is limited. This expert panel review discusses the history and evolution of cardiovascular MDHTs, their composition and role in treating patients across a broad spectrum of disciplines, basic tenets for successful operation, and the future challenges facing them.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.