ArticleJournal of child & adolescent trauma2024
State of the Evidence of Attachment Regulation and Competency Framework and Adaptions: A Rapid Scoping Review.
Article in Journal of child & adolescent trauma, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The majority of children with traumatic experiences who seek treatment have had multiple traumatic experiences resulting in complex trauma. Complex trauma is associated with multiple adverse outcomes for children and caregivers. Treating complex trauma has the potential to significantly improve child mental and physical health, caregiver mental health, and reduce family conflict. One promising approach is the Attachment, Regulation, and Competency (ARC) Framework. Yet, there is limited research on the effectiveness of interventions using the ARC framework. The purpose of this rapid scoping review was to assess the state of the evidence of ARC and ARC adaptations. The databases APA PsycINFO, Social Work Abstracts, and Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts were searched. The search was limited to articles involving interventions using the ARC framework and written in English. To be as comprehensive as possible quantitative, qualitative and mixed methods designs were included and there was no date restriction. Ten articles were included in the review. Results show all studies were quasi experimental, half did not include a comparison group, and interventions using the ARC framework varied in duration (12-180 sessions), setting (outpatient therapy, residential treatment, community outreach and school-based intervention) and age (birth-22). Findings indicate the ARC framework shows promise in reducing children's trauma related symptoms including post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD), externalizing, and internalizing problems, and improving trauma sensitive classroom environments. Additional outcomes included increased permanent placements, reduced caregiver stress and increased caregiver functioning. Future research is needed utilizing randomized controlled trials to establish efficacy of this promising intervention.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.