Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38938951›Full record

ArticleJournal of child & adolescent trauma2024

A Scoping Review of Mental Health and Wellbeing Outcome Measures for Children and Young People: Implications for Children in Out-of-home Care.

Paula Jacobs, Luke Power, Gavin Davidson, John Devaney, Claire McCartan, Pearse McCusker, Ruth Jenkins

Abstract readScoping Review
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of child & adolescent trauma, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Paula JacobsFaculty of Social Sciences, Social Work, University of Stirling, Colin Bell Building, Stirling, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-5593-5899
Luke PowerSchool of Social and Political Science, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.
Gavin DavidsonSchool of Social Sciences, Education and Social Work, Queen's University Belfast, Belfast, UK.
John DevaneySchool of Social and Political Science, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.
Claire McCartanSchool of Social Sciences, Education and Social Work, Queen's University Belfast, Belfast, UK.
Pearse McCuskerSchool of Social and Political Science, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.
Ruth JenkinsAcademic Support Librarian, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.

Funding

Medical Research Council MR/T046848/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: One of the challenges for mental health research is the lack of an agreed set of outcome measures that are used routinely and consistently between disciplines and across studies in order to build a more robust evidence base for how to better understand young people's mental health and effectively address diverse needs. Methods: This study involved a scoping review of reviews on consensus of the use of mental health and wellbeing measures with children and young people. We were particularly interested to identify if there are differences in measures that are recommended for children and young people with care experience including those with developmental disabilities. Findings: We identified 41 reviews, of which two had a focus on child welfare settings, three on childhood trauma and 14 focused on children and young people with developmental disabilities. Overall, our review highlights a lack of consensus and a diversity of measures within the field. We identified 60 recommended measures, of which only nine were recommended by more than one review. Conclusions: Our review highlights the need for greater agreement in the use of mental health outcome measures. While our review highlights that there is value in identifying measures that can be used with any child or young person, researchers need to take into account additional considerations when working with children and young people with care experience and those with developmental disabilities, to ensure measures are accessible and sensitive to their life experiences.

Indexed as

CareDisabilityMeasuresMental healthNeurodivergence

Identifiers

PMID38938951
PMCPMC11199430

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.