ArticleAesthetic surgery journal. Open forum2024
Comparison of 2 Fillers for Lip Injection-A Randomized-Controlled Clinical Trial Assessed by 3D Imaging.
Article in Aesthetic surgery journal. Open forum, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Enhancing Lip Augmentation Safety and Aesthetics Through 11-Point Injection Technique and Sonographic Vascular Mapping.Plastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open · 2026Article
- Does Lip Augmentation With Hyaluronic Acid Affect Lip Motricity in Young Patients?Journal of cosmetic dermatology · 2026Article
- Impact of Hyaluronic Acid Lip Filling on the Electromyographic Activity of the Orbicularis Oris Muscle in Adult Women.Indian journal of plastic surgery : official publication of the Association of Plastic Surgeons of India · 2025Article
- Article
- Safety and Efficacy of a New Hyaluronic Acid Filler for Lip Augmentation: A Prospective, Multicenter, Randomized, Controlled Study.Aesthetic surgery journal. Open forum · 2025Article
- Volumizing threads and hyaluronic acid filler for lip augmentation.Skin research and technology : official journal of International Society for Bioengineering and the Skin (ISBS) [and] International Society for Digital Imaging of Skin (ISDIS) [and] International Society for Skin Imaging (ISSI) · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Lip aging is a concern for many, and hyaluronic acid (HA) injections are a popular solution. Objectives: This study compared 2 different HA gel technologies (OBT and NASHA) for lip augmentation in 20 volunteers. Methods: Both groups received treatment from the same injector using the same method. Lip volume was measured with a 3D stereophotogrammetry device before, immediately after, and 30 days posttreatment. Patient satisfaction and adverse events were assessed through FACE-Q scales analysis. Results: The NASHA group showed an immediate volume increase ( Conclusions: This study highlights that less cohesive gels may modify faster in dynamic lip areas, emphasizing the importance of selecting products based on their physicochemical and rheological properties. In the context of lip augmentation with HA, it is important not to consider immediate aesthetic changes as definitive results, as volume changes may persist and develop over time after the treatment. Level of Evidence 2:
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.