ArticleHealth care science2022
Evaluating the integrated antimicrobial stewardship system of China by the assessment tool of WHO.
Article in Health care science, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Barriers and facilitators to implementing antimicrobial stewardship (AMS) in a Chinese tertiary hospital: a qualitative study based on the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR).BMC infectious diseases · 2026Article
- Multidisciplinary administrative-professional-technical interventions to optimize antibiotic use and reduce resistance in a tertiary general hospital.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2025Article
- Antimicrobial resistance in China across human, animal, and environment sectors - a review of policy documents using a governance framework.The Lancet regional health. Western Pacific · 2024Review
- Article
- Evaluating the integrated antimicrobial stewardship system of China by the assessment tool of WHO.Health care science · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: To fully understand the overall system and implementation of antimicrobial stewardship (AMS) at different levels in China, an evaluation according to the integrated AMS evaluation tool developed by World Health Organization (WHO) was conducted. Methods: A comprehensive search on the AMS relevant government policies, regulations, scientific research results, public and social activities was conducted, and the implementation of AMS strategies in national, subnational and hospital level were evaluated by the standards of the WHO. Results: The results shew that the system construction, technical infrastructure and actions of AMS in China at the national level is relatively satisfied, but the AMS system needs to be further strengthened at the subnational and the medical institutional level, especially the integration of multidisciplinary teams and relevant departments; the implementation of professional intervention strategies, national education and publicity, professional education and training are relatively weak. AMS implementation is mainly promoted at the national level, and AMS in primary medical institutions is almost missing. It is necessary to carry out AMS at the provincial level and medical institutions as soon as possible. The focus is to establish a professional AMS team, prepare AMS guideline, implement AMS strategy, raise public awareness and ensure the long-term and sustainable development of AMS in the country. Conclusion: The Chinese government has established a system for AMS, and implemented a multisectoral coordinative mechanism. However, at the subnational and district levels, an AMS system and practice should be set up soon to promote the rational use of antibiotics.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.