ArticleHealth care science2022
Decision-making for early major amputation in selected diabetic foot ulcer patients with peripheral vascular disease.
Article in Health care science, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Mesenchymal stem cell therapy in diabetic foot ulcer: An updated comprehensive review.Health science reports · 2024Article
- Function and mechanism of mesenchymal stem cells in the healing of diabetic foot wounds.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2023Review
- Decision-making for early major amputation in selected diabetic foot ulcer patients with peripheral vascular disease.Health care science · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: To estimate the costs from delaying major amputation in patients with concurrent diabetic foot ulcer and peripheral vascular disease. We seek to model economic benefits from saved costs from promoting timely major amputations among these patients. Methods: Retrospective modeling using data from National University Hospital, Singapore. We identified patients who might have delayed major amputations by applying a hierarchical clustering algorithm. We then modeled the transitions of all patients over time with a Markov process using a number of relevant health states to enable estimation of cost outcomes. We next summarized the expected changes to the bed days used and cost outcomes arising from reassigning some patients who may have had a delayed amputation to timely amputation. The findings from the sample were scaled to reflect national incidence rates for this disease for the years 2014-2019 in Singapore. Results and Conclusions: Nine of the 137 patients (6.57%) would be suitable for a major amputation at 3 months, yet in reality, their amputation was delayed. Based on this, and assuming a timely amputation is done for the entire population of patients in Singapore we expect annual savings of 264,791 bed days and $211 million in costs. These findings are preliminary and uncertain. The value of this paper is to show a method for estimating outcomes, report the findings from a small sample, and stimulate future research. New cohort studies might be designed to capture a wider range of outcomes and recruit a larger sample of individuals.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.