Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38938848›Full record

ArticleJournal of extracellular biology2024

Comparative analysis of the effects of different purification methods on the yield and purity of cow milk extracellular vesicles.

Santeri Kankaanpää, Markus Nurmi, Markus Lampimäki, Heidi Leskinen, Anni Nieminen, Anatoliy Samoylenko, Seppo J Vainio, Sari Mäkinen, Lauri Ahonen, Juha Kangasluoma and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of extracellular biology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Santeri KankaanpääNatural Resources Institute Finland Jokioinen Finland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8674-9914
Markus NurmiNatural Resources Institute Finland Jokioinen Finland.
Markus LampimäkiInstitute for Atmospheric and Earth System Research (INAR) / Physics University of Helsinki Helsinki Finland.
Heidi LeskinenNatural Resources Institute Finland Jokioinen Finland.
Anni NieminenMetabolomics Unit, Institute for Molecular Medicine Finland University of Helsinki Helsinki Finland.
Anatoliy SamoylenkoUniversity of Oulu, Kvantum Institute, Infotech Oulu, Faculty of Biochemistry and Molecular Medicine, Disease Networks Research Unit Oulu University Oulu Finland.
Seppo J VainioUniversity of Oulu, Kvantum Institute, Infotech Oulu, Faculty of Biochemistry and Molecular Medicine, Disease Networks Research Unit Oulu University Oulu Finland.
Sari MäkinenNatural Resources Institute Finland Jokioinen Finland.
Lauri AhonenInstitute for Atmospheric and Earth System Research (INAR) / Physics University of Helsinki Helsinki Finland.
Juha KangasluomaInstitute for Atmospheric and Earth System Research (INAR) / Physics University of Helsinki Helsinki Finland.
Tuukka PetäjäInstitute for Atmospheric and Earth System Research (INAR) / Physics University of Helsinki Helsinki Finland.
Sirja ViitalaNatural Resources Institute Finland Jokioinen Finland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Isolation of extracellular vesicles (EV) has been developing rapidly in parallel with the interest in EVs. However, commonly utilized protocols may not suit more challenging sample matrixes and could potentially yield suboptimal results. Knowing and assessing the pitfalls of isolation procedure to be used, should be involved to some extent for EV analytics. EVs in cow milk are of great interest due to their abundancy and large-scale availability as well as their cross-species bioavailability and possible use as drug carriers. However, the characteristics of milk EVs overlap with those of other milk components. This makes it difficult to isolate and study EVs individually. There exists also a lack of consensus for isolation methods. In this study, we demonstrated the differences between various differential centrifugation-based approaches for isolation of large quantities of EVs from cow milk. Samples were further purified with gradient centrifugation and size exclusion chromatography (SEC) and differences were analyzed. Quality measurements were conducted on multiple independent platforms. Particle analysis, electron microscopy and RNA analysis were used, to comprehensively characterize the isolated samples and to identify the limitations and possible sources of contamination in the EV isolation protocols. Vesicle concentration to protein ratio and RNA to protein ratios were observed to increase as samples were purified, suggesting co-isolation with major milk proteins in direct differential centrifugation protocols. We demonstrated a novel size assessment of vesicles using a particle mobility analyzer that matched the sizing using electron microscopy in contrast to commonly utilized nanoparticle tracking analysis. Based on the standards of the International Society for Extracellular Vesicles and the quick checklist of EV-Track.org for EV isolation, we emphasize the need for complete characterization and validation of the isolation protocol with all EV-related work to ensure the accuracy of results and allow further analytics and experiments.

Indexed as

bioaerosolextracellular vesiclesisolation protocolmilkvalidation

Identifiers

PMID38938848
PMCPMC11080921

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.