Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38938752›Full record

ReviewBioImpacts : BI2024

Regulation of cell fate by cell imprinting approach in vitro.

Farkhonde Hasannejad, Leila Montazeri, João F Mano, Shahin Bonakdar, Ahmad Fazilat

Abstract readReview
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in BioImpacts : BI, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Farkhonde HasannejadDepartment of Tissue Engineering and Applied Cell Sciences, School of Medicine, Semnan ‎University of Medical Science, Semnan, Iran.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9722-9116
Leila MontazeriDepartment of Cell Engineering, Cell Science Research Center, Royan Institute for Stem Cell ‎Biology and Technology, ACECR, Tehran, Iran.
João F ManoDepartment of Chemistry, CICECO - Aveiro Institute of Materials, University of Aveiro, ‎Portugal.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2342-3765
Shahin BonakdarNational Cell Bank Department, Pasteur Institute of Iran, Tehran, Iran.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8759-3790
Ahmad FazilatGenetic Department, Breast Cancer Research Center, Motamed Cancer Institute, ACECR, ‎Tehran, Iran.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cell culture-based technologies are widely utilized in various domains such as drug evaluation, toxicity assessment, vaccine and biopharmaceutical development, reproductive technology, and regenerative medicine. It has been demonstrated that pre-adsorption of extracellular matrix (ECM) proteins including collagen, laminin and fibronectin provide more degrees of support for cell adhesion. The purpose of cell imprinting is to imitate the natural topography of cell membranes by gels or polymers to create a reliable environment for the regulation of cell function. The results of recent studies show that cell imprinting is a tool to guide the behavior of cultured cells by controlling their adhesive interactions with surfaces. Therefore, in this review we aim to compare different cell cultures with the imprinting method and discuss different cell imprinting applications in regenerative medicine, personalized medicine, disease modeling, and cell therapy.

Indexed as

Cell imprintingCell therapyDisease modelingMolecular imprintingPersonalized medicineRegenerative medicine

Identifiers

PMID38938752
PMCPMC11199935

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.