ArticleJACC. Advances2023
Deep Learning to Estimate Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction From Routine Coronary Angiographic Images.
Article in JACC. Advances, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed.
- Review
- Deep learning for estimating right ventricular function from routine coronary angiography.European heart journal. Digital health · 2026Article
- Predicting cardiac index from coronary angiogram videos: a novel application of 3D convolutional neural networks.BMJ digital health & AI · 2026Article
- Ejection fraction quantification from ungated chest CT by AI.medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences · 2025Article
- Optimizing Input Selection for Cardiac Model Training and Inference: An Efficient 3D Convolutional Neural Networks-Based Approach to Automate Coronary Angiogram Video Selection.Mayo Clinic proceedings. Digital health · 2025Article
- Segmentation-Free Estimation of Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction Using 3D CNN Is Reliable and Improves as Multiple Cardiac MRI Cine Orientations Are Combined.Biomedicines · 2024Article
- Advancements and applications of artificial intelligence in cardiovascular imaging: a comprehensive review.European heart journal. Imaging methods and practice · 2024Review
- Revolutionising Acute Cardiac Care With Artificial Intelligence: Opportunities and Challenges.The Canadian journal of cardiology · 2024Review
- Agreement of ejection fraction measured by coronary computed tomography (CT) and cardiac ultrasound in evaluating patients with chronic heart failure: an observational comparative study.Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery · 2024Article
- Do You See the Writing on the Wall?: What Coronary Arteries Tell About Ventricular Function.JACC. Advances · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Cine images during coronary angiography contain a wealth of information besides the assessment of coronary stenosis. We hypothesized that deep learning (DL) can discern moderate-severe left ventricular dysfunction among patients undergoing coronary angiography. Objectives: The purpose of this study was to assess the ability of machine learning models in estimating left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) from routine coronary angiographic images. Methods: We developed a combined 3D-convolutional neural network (CNN) and transformer to estimate LVEF for diagnostic coronary angiograms of the left coronary artery (LCA). Two angiograms, left anterior oblique (LAO)-caudal and right anterior oblique (RAO)-cranial projections, were fed into the model simultaneously. The model classified LVEF as significantly reduced (LVEF ≤40%) vs normal or mildly reduced (LVEF>40%). Echocardiogram performed within 30 days served as the gold standard for LVEF. Results: A collection of 18,809 angiograms from 17,346 patients from Mayo Clinic were included (mean age 67.29; 35% women). Each patient appeared only in the training (70%), validation (10%), or testing set (20%). The model exhibited excellent performance (area under the receiver operator curve [AUC] 0.87; sensitivity 0.77; specificity 0.80) in the training set. The model's performance exceeded human expert assessment (AUC, sensitivity, and specificity of 0.86, 0.76, and 0.77, respectively) vs (AUC, sensitivity, and specificity of 0.76-0.77, 0.50-0.44, and 0.90-0.93, respectively). In additional sensitivity analyses, combining the LAO and RAO views yielded a higher AUC, sensitivity, and specificity than utilizing either LAO or RAO individually. The original model combining CNN and transformer was superior to DL models using either 3D-CNN or transformers. Conclusions: A novel DL algorithm demonstrated rapid and accurate assessment of LVEF from routine coronary angiography. The algorithm can be used to support clinical decision-making and form the foundation for future models that could extract meaningful data from routine angiography studies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.