Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38938722›Full record

ArticleJACC. Advances2023

Deep Learning to Estimate Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction From Routine Coronary Angiographic Images.

Behrouz Rostami, Kenneth Fetterly, Zachi Attia, Apurva Challa, Francisco Lopez-Jimenez, Jeremy Thaden, Samuel Asirvatham, Paul Friedman, Rajiv Gulati, Mohamad Alkhouli

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JACC. Advances, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Ejection fraction quantification from ungated chest CT by AI.medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Behrouz RostamiDepartment of Cardiovascular Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA.
Kenneth FetterlyDepartment of Cardiovascular Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA.
Zachi AttiaDepartment of Cardiovascular Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA.
Apurva ChallaDepartment of Cardiovascular Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA.
Francisco Lopez-JimenezDepartment of Cardiovascular Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA.
Jeremy ThadenDepartment of Cardiovascular Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA.
Samuel AsirvathamDepartment of Cardiovascular Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA.
Paul FriedmanDepartment of Cardiovascular Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA.
Rajiv GulatiDepartment of Cardiovascular Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA.
Mohamad AlkhouliDepartment of Cardiovascular Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Cine images during coronary angiography contain a wealth of information besides the assessment of coronary stenosis. We hypothesized that deep learning (DL) can discern moderate-severe left ventricular dysfunction among patients undergoing coronary angiography. Objectives: The purpose of this study was to assess the ability of machine learning models in estimating left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) from routine coronary angiographic images. Methods: We developed a combined 3D-convolutional neural network (CNN) and transformer to estimate LVEF for diagnostic coronary angiograms of the left coronary artery (LCA). Two angiograms, left anterior oblique (LAO)-caudal and right anterior oblique (RAO)-cranial projections, were fed into the model simultaneously. The model classified LVEF as significantly reduced (LVEF ≤40%) vs normal or mildly reduced (LVEF>40%). Echocardiogram performed within 30 days served as the gold standard for LVEF. Results: A collection of 18,809 angiograms from 17,346 patients from Mayo Clinic were included (mean age 67.29; 35% women). Each patient appeared only in the training (70%), validation (10%), or testing set (20%). The model exhibited excellent performance (area under the receiver operator curve [AUC] 0.87; sensitivity 0.77; specificity 0.80) in the training set. The model's performance exceeded human expert assessment (AUC, sensitivity, and specificity of 0.86, 0.76, and 0.77, respectively) vs (AUC, sensitivity, and specificity of 0.76-0.77, 0.50-0.44, and 0.90-0.93, respectively). In additional sensitivity analyses, combining the LAO and RAO views yielded a higher AUC, sensitivity, and specificity than utilizing either LAO or RAO individually. The original model combining CNN and transformer was superior to DL models using either 3D-CNN or transformers. Conclusions: A novel DL algorithm demonstrated rapid and accurate assessment of LVEF from routine coronary angiography. The algorithm can be used to support clinical decision-making and form the foundation for future models that could extract meaningful data from routine angiography studies.

Indexed as

artificial intelligencecoronary angiographydeep learningleft ventricular ejection fraction

Identifiers

PMID38938722
PMCPMC11198437

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.