ArticlePolish journal of radiology2024
Enhancing diagnostic precision: comparative analysis of MR-guided breast biopsies performed in two centres.
Article in Polish journal of radiology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: Breast lesions that remain elusive in traditional imaging techniques such as ultrasound and mammography pose a diagnostic challenge. In such cases, magnetic resonance (MR)-guided breast biopsy emerges as a crucial tool for accurate histopathological verification. This article presents a comparative study conducted at 2 centres, exploring the results of MR-guided breast biopsies performed by experienced radiologists, based on inside and external referrals. Material and methods: The study involved 228 patients, 120 of whom underwent biopsies at Centre 1, where the same radiologist performed both the qualification and biopsy. The remaining 108 patients were biopsied at Centre 2, based on referrals from different institutions. Uniform examination protocols were adopted at both centres, and all biopsies underwent histopathological verification. Results: The distribution of lesion types was found to be independent of the apparatus used for biopsies ( Conclusions: MR-guided breast biopsy serves as a remarkable tool for verifying lesions that evade detection through conventional imaging methods and physical examinations. The study findings underscore the crucial role of radiologist experience in determining the efficacy of MR-guided breast biopsies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.