Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38938657›Full record

ReviewPolish journal of radiology2024

Update on elbow arthroplasties with emphasis on imaging.

Nicholson S Chadwick, Jennifer S Weaver, Joanna L Shechtel, Gregory L Hall, Christopher L Shultz, Mihra S Taljanovic

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Polish journal of radiology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Total elbow arthroplasty-a historical review.JSES reviews, reports, and techniques · 2026
    Review
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Nicholson S ChadwickVanderbilt University Medical Center, United States.
Jennifer S WeaverUniversity of Texas Health San Antonio, United States.
Joanna L ShechtelVanderbilt University Medical Center, United States.
Gregory L HallOregon Health and Science University, United States.
Christopher L ShultzUniversity of New Mexico, School of Medicine, United States.
Mihra S TaljanovicBanner University Medical Center, United States.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Elbow arthroplasty is increasing in popularity and can be used to treat many conditions, such as trauma, primary and secondary osteoarthritis, inflammatory arthritis, and osteonecrosis. Total elbow arthroplasty (TEA) is reserved for patients with severe symptoms refractory to more conservative management. In addition to TEA, hemi-arthroplasty, interposition arthroplasty, and resection arthroplasty also play roles in the management of elbow pain. There are specific indications for each type of arthroplasty. Postoperative complications may occur with elbow arthroplasties and may be surgery or hardware related. Imaging is important in both pre-operative planning as well as in post-surgical follow-up. This article reviews the different types of elbow arthroplasties, their indications, their normal postoperative imaging appearances, and imaging findings of potential complications.

Indexed as

arthritisarthroplastycomputed tomographyelbowmagnetic resonance imagingultrasound

Identifiers

PMID38938657
PMCPMC11210383

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.