Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38938649›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in cardiovascular medicine2024

Open- vs. closed-chest pig models of donation after circulatory death.

Valentin Hubacher, Manuel Egle, Selianne Graf, Maria Arnold, Adrian Segiser, Maria Nieves Sanz, Daniela Casoni, Luisana Garcia Casalta, Kay Nettelbeck, Maks Mihalj and 3 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Brief hypothermic oxygenated perfusion provides cardioprotection in a pig model of donation after circulatory death.European journal of cardio-thoracic surgery : official journal of the European Association for Cardio-thoracic Surgery · 2025
    Article
  5. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Valentin HubacherDepartment of Cardiac Surgery, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.
Manuel EgleDepartment of Cardiac Surgery, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.
Selianne GrafDepartment of Cardiac Surgery, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.
Maria ArnoldDepartment of Cardiac Surgery, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.
Adrian SegiserDepartment of Cardiac Surgery, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.
Maria Nieves SanzDepartment of Cardiac Surgery, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.
Daniela CasoniExperimental Surgery Facility (ESF), Experimental Animal Center, Faculty of Medicine, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.
Luisana Garcia CasaltaExperimental Surgery Facility (ESF), Experimental Animal Center, Faculty of Medicine, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.
Kay NettelbeckExperimental Surgery Facility (ESF), Experimental Animal Center, Faculty of Medicine, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.
Maks MihaljDepartment of Cardiac Surgery, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.
Matthias SiepeDepartment of Cardiac Surgery, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.
Alexander KadnerDepartment of Cardiac Surgery, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.
Sarah LongnusDepartment of Cardiac Surgery, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: During donation after circulatory death (DCD), cardiac grafts are exposed to potentially damaging conditions that can impact their quality and post-transplantation outcomes. In a clinical DCD setting, patients have closed chests in most cases, while many experimental models have used open-chest conditions. We therefore aimed to investigate and characterize differences in open- vs. closed-chest porcine models. Methods: Withdrawal of life-sustaining therapy (WLST) was simulated in anesthetized juvenile male pigs by stopping mechanical ventilation following the administration of a neuromuscular block. Functional warm ischemic time (fWIT) was defined to start when systolic arterial pressure was <50 mmHg. Hemodynamic changes and blood chemistry were analyzed. Two experimental groups were compared: (i) an open-chest group with sternotomy prior to WLST and (ii) a closed-chest group with sternotomy after fWIT. Results: Hemodynamic changes during the progression from WLST to fWIT were initiated by a rapid decline in blood oxygen saturation and a subsequent cardiovascular hyperdynamic (HD) period characterized by temporary elevations in heart rates and arterial pressures in both groups. Subsequently, heart rate and systolic arterial pressure decreased until fWIT was reached. Pigs in the open-chest group displayed a more rapid transition to the HD phase after WLST, with peak heart rate and peak rate-pressure product occurring significantly earlier. Furthermore, the HD phase duration tended to be shorter and less intense (lower peak rate-pressure product) in the open-chest group than in the closed-chest group. Discussion: Progression from WLST to fWIT was more rapid, and the hemodynamic changes tended to be less pronounced in the open-chest group than in the closed-chest group. Our findings support clear differences between open- and closed-chest models of DCD. Therefore, recommendations for clinical DCD protocols based on findings in open-chest models must be interpreted with care.

Indexed as

DCD heart transplantationDCD pig modeldonation after circulatory death (DCD)open- vs. closed-chest physiologywarm ischemia

Identifiers

PMID38938649
PMCPMC11210375

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.