Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38938646›Full record

ArticleKidney medicine2024

Patient Perspectives on Using Telemedicine During In-Center Hemodialysis: A Qualitative Study.

Trenton M Haltom, Susie Q Lew, Wolfgang C Winkelmayer, Glenn M Chertow, Allison Jaure, Kevin F Erickson

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Kidney medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Nephrologist Perspectives on Using Telemedicine During In-Center Hemodialysis: A Qualitative Study.American journal of kidney diseases : the official journal of the National Kidney Foundation · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Trenton M HaltomCenter for Innovations in Quality, Effectiveness and Safety, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX.
Susie Q LewDivision of Renal Diseases and Hypertension, George Washington University, Washington, DC.
Wolfgang C WinkelmayerSection of Nephrology, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX.
Glenn M ChertowDivision of Nephrology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Palo Alto, CA.
Allison JaureSchool of Public Health, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia.
Kevin F EricksonCenter for Innovations in Quality, Effectiveness and Safety, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX.

Funding

The Effects Of Telemedicine on Health Outcomes, Costs, and Perceptions of Care Delivery in In-Center HemodialysisR01DK128209 · NIDDK · BAYLOR COLLEGE OF MEDICINE · PI ERICKSON, KEVIN · 2021 to 2025
$3.0M
NIDDK NIH HHS R01 DK128209
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Rationale & Objective: In the wake of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, the United States federal government expanded originating telemedicine sites to include outpatient dialysis units. For the first time, nephrology practitioners across the United States could replace face-to-face visits with telemedicine for patients receiving in-center hemodialysis. This study describes patients' perspectives on the use of telemedicine during in-center hemodialysis. Study Design: A qualitative study. Setting & Participants: Thirty-two patients from underserved populations (older, less educated, unemployed, persons of color) receiving in-center hemodialysis who used telemedicine with their nephrologist during the COVID-19 pandemic. Analytical Approach: Telephone semistructured interviews were conducted in English or Spanish. Transcripts were thematically analyzed. Results: We identified 6 themes with subthemes: adapting to telemedicine (gaining familiarity and confidence, overcoming and resolving technical difficulties, and relying on staff for communication); ensuring availability of the physician (enabling an immediate response to urgent medical needs, providing peace of mind, addressing patient needs adequately, and enhanced attention and contact from physicians); safeguarding against infection (limiting COVID-19 exposures and decreasing use); straining communication and physical interactions (loss of personalized touch, limited physical examination, and unable to reapproach physicians about forgotten issues); maintaining privacy (enhancing privacy and projecting voice enables others to hear); and supporting confidence in telemedicine (requiring established rapport with physicians, clinical stabilty of health, and ability to have in-person visits when necessary). Limitations: Interviews were conducted later in the pandemic when some nephrology care providers were using telemedicine infrequently. Conclusions: Patients receiving in-center hemodialysis adapted to telemedicine visits by their nephrologists in the context of the COVID-19 pandemic and observed its benefits. However, further considerations regarding communication, privacy, and physical assessments are necessary. Integrating telemedicine into future in-center hemodialysis care using a hybrid approach could potentially build trust, optimize communication, and augment care.

Indexed as

Hemodialysisqualitative interviewstelemedicine

Identifiers

PMID38938646
PMCPMC11209005

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.