ArticleFrontiers in endocrinology2024
Hounsfield unit for assessing bone mineral density distribution within lumbar vertebrae and its clinical values.
Article in Frontiers in endocrinology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed.
- Hounsfield unit measurements from different regions of interest in lumbar spine CT: correlation with DEXA-derived bone mineral density and fracture status.BMC musculoskeletal disorders · 2026Article
- Which vertebral levels provide practical HU-based assessment for osteoporosis screening? A comparative analysis from T1 to S2.Journal of orthopaedic surgery and research · 2026Article
- A Novel Nomogram for Predicting Osteoporotic Vertebral Compression Fractures with Hounsfield Unit and Vertebral Bone Quality: A Retrospective Cohort Study.Clinical interventions in aging · 2026Article
- Heterogeneity in Lumbar Segmental Bone Mineral Density and Age-Related Evolution of Whole-Body Bone Mineral Density: Comprehensive Implications for Osteoporosis Risk Assessment.Orthopaedic surgery · 2026Article
- The Association Between Short-Term Bone Loss and Future Osteoporotic Vertebral Fractures.Clinical interventions in aging · 2026Article
- Longitudinal Bone Density During TSH Suppression in Differentiated Thyroid Cancer: A Paired PET/CT Analysis.Cancers · 2025Article
- Automated Volumetric Assessment of Hounsfield Units Using a Deep-Reasoning and Learning Model: Correlations with DXA Metrics.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Article
- Evaluation of Cancellous Bone Density from C3 to L5 in 11 Body Donors: CT Versus Micro-CT Measurements.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Article
- Regional variations and spatial heterogeneity of lumbar CT attenuation are associated with osteoporotic vertebral fracture.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2025Article
- Evaluating bone mineral density in osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures: the clinical utility of anterior column Hounsfield units.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2025Article
- Radiomic-based biomarkers: Transforming age and body composition metrics into personalized age-informed indices.Clinical and translational science · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Study Design: Retrospective radiological analysis. Objective: The aim of this study is to evaluate the distribution of bone mineral density (BMD) in lumbar vertebrae using the Hounsfield unit (HU) measurement method and investigate the clinical implications of HU values for assessing lumbar vertebrae BMD. Method: Two hundred and ninety-six patients were retrospectively reviewed and divided into six groups according to age: Group 1(20-29 years old), Group 2 (30-39 years old), Group 3 (40-49 years old), Group 4 (50-59 years old), Group 5 (60-69 years old), Group 6 (70-79 years old). Six different locations from each vertebra of L1-L5 were selected as regions of interest: the anterior, middle and posterior parts of the upper and lower slices of the vertebrae. HU values were measured for the six regions of interest, followed by statistical analysis. Results: The HU values of vertebrae showed a decreasing trend from young patients to elderly patients in Group 1 to Group 5. There was no significant difference in HU values among different vertebrae in the same age group. In all age groups, the HU values of the anterior and posterior part of the vertebral body were significantly different from L1 to L3, with the anterior part of the vertebral body having lower HU values than the posterior part. The HU values of the anterior and posterior part of the vertebral body of L4 and L5 were statistically significant only in Group 5 and Group 6, and the HU values of the anterior part of the vertebral body were lower than those of the posterior part. The HU values of posterior part of L4 and L5 in Group6 were higher than those in Group5. Conclusion: Bone mineral density in the lumbar vertebrae is not uniformly distributed, potentially attributed to varying stress stimuli. The assessment of local HU values in the lumbar spine is of significant importance for surgical treatment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.