Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38938511›Full record

SynthesisFrontiers in genome editing2024

Horizon scanning of potential environmental applications of terrestrial animals, fish, algae and microorganisms produced by genetic modification, including the use of new genomic techniques.

Marianne Miklau, Sarah-Joe Burn, Michael Eckerstorfer, Marion Dolezel, Anita Greiter, Andreas Heissenberger, Stefan Hörtenhuber, Werner Zollitsch, Kristin Hagen

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Frontiers in genome editing, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Marianne MiklauDepartment of Landuse and Biosafety, Environment Agency Austria, Vienna, Austria.
Sarah-Joe BurnDepartment of Sustainable Agricultural Systems, University of Natural Resources and Life Sciences, Vienna, Austria.
Michael EckerstorferDepartment of Landuse and Biosafety, Environment Agency Austria, Vienna, Austria.
Marion DolezelDepartment of Landuse and Biosafety, Environment Agency Austria, Vienna, Austria.
Anita GreiterDepartment of Landuse and Biosafety, Environment Agency Austria, Vienna, Austria.
Andreas HeissenbergerDepartment of Landuse and Biosafety, Environment Agency Austria, Vienna, Austria.
Stefan HörtenhuberDepartment of Sustainable Agricultural Systems, University of Natural Resources and Life Sciences, Vienna, Austria.
Werner ZollitschDepartment of Sustainable Agricultural Systems, University of Natural Resources and Life Sciences, Vienna, Austria.
Kristin HagenFederal Agency for Nature Conservation, Division Assessment Synthetic Biology/Enforcement Genetic Engineering Act, Bonn, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

With scientific progress and the development of new genomic techniques (NGTs), the spectrum of organisms modified for various purposes is rapidly expanding and includes a wide range of taxonomic groups. An improved understanding of which newly developed products may be introduced into the market and released into the environment in the near and more distant future is of particular interest for policymakers, regulatory authorities, and risk assessors. To address this information need, we conducted a horizon scanning (HS) of potential environmental applications in four groups of organisms: terrestrial animals (excluding insects and applications with gene drives), fish, algae and microorganisms. We applied a formal scoping review methodology comprising a structured search of the scientific literature followed by eligibility screening, complemented by a survey of grey literature, and regulatory websites and databases. In all four groups of organisms we identified a broad range of potential applications in stages of basic as well as advanced research, and a limited number of applications which are on, or ready to be placed on, the market. Research on GM animals including fish is focused on farmed animals and primarily targets traits which increase performance, influence reproduction, or convey resistance against diseases. GM algae identified in the HS were all unicellular, with more than half of the articles concerning biofuel production. GM algae applications for use in the environment include biocontrol and bioremediation, which are also the main applications identified for GM microorganisms. From a risk assessor's perspective these potential applications entail a multitude of possible pathways to harm. The current limited level of experience and limited amount of available scientific information could constitute a significant challenge in the near future, for which risk assessors and competent authorities urgently need to prepare.

Indexed as

algaefishgenetically modified organismgenetic engineeringgenome editingmicroorganismnew genomic techniquesterrestrial animal

Identifiers

PMID38938511
PMCPMC11208717

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.