Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38938475›Full record

ArticleJournal of instrumentation : an IOP and SISSA journal2022

Depth resolved pencil beam radiography using AI - a proof of principle study.

Ida Häggström, Lukas M Carter, Thomas J Fuchs, Adam L Kesner

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of instrumentation : an IOP and SISSA journal, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Ida HäggströmDept. of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, USA.
Lukas M CarterDept. of Medical Physics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, USA.
Thomas J FuchsDept. of Pathology, Hasso Plattner Institute for Digital Health, Mount Sinai Medical School, New York, USA.
Adam L KesnerDept. of Medical Physics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, USA.

Funding

X-RAY CRYSTALLOGRAPHYP30CA008748 · NCI · SLOAN-KETTERING INSTITUTE FOR CANCER RES · PI Nicholas D Socci · 1985 to 2026
$347.4M
MIRDCalc – A Community Tool for Deriving and Reporting Patient Organ Doses in Nuclear Medicine, Computed Tomography, and Hybrid ImagingU01EB028234 · NIBIB · SLOAN-KETTERING INST CAN RESEARCH · PI BOLCH, WESLEY E, KESNER, ADAM LEON · 2019 to 2023
$3.2M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA008748NIBIB NIH HHS U01 EB028234
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimsClinical radiographic imaging is seated upon the principle of differential keV photon transmission through an object. At clinical x-ray energies the scattering of photons causes signal noise and is utilized solely for transmission measurements. However, scatter - particularly Compton scatter, is characterizable. In this work we hypothesized that modern radiation sources and detectors paired with deep learning techniques can use scattered photon information constructively to resolve superimposed attenuators in planar x-ray imaging.

methodsWe simulated a monoenergetic x-ray imaging system consisting of a pencil beam x-ray source directed at an imaging target positioned in front of a high spatial- and energy-resolution detector array. The setup maximizes information capture of transmitted photons by measuring off-axis scatter location and energy. The signal was analyzed by a convolutional neural network, and a description of scattering material along the axis of the beam was derived. The system was virtually designed/tested using Monte Carlo processing of simple phantoms consisting of 10 pseudo-randomly stacked air/bone/water materials, and the network was trained by solving a classification problem.

resultsFrom our simulations we were able to resolve traversed material depth information to a high degree, within our simple imaging task. The average accuracy of the material identification along the beam was 0.91±0.01, with slightly higher accuracy towards the entrance/exit peripheral surfaces of the object. The average sensitivity and specificity was 0.91 and 0.95, respectively.

conclusionsOur work provides proof of principle that deep learning techniques can be used to analyze scattered photon patterns which can constructively contribute to the information content in radiography, here used to infer depth information in a traditional 2D planar setup. This principle, and our results, demonstrate that the information in Compton scattered photons may provide a basis for further development. The work was limited by simple testing scenarios and without yet integrating complexities or optimizations. The ability to scale performance to the clinic remains unexplored and requires further study.

Indexed as

Compton scatterdeep learningdose reductionpencil beamscatter tomographytomographyx-ray imaging

Identifiers

PMID38938475
PMCPMC11210439

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.