Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38938463›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in psychiatry2024

Facial emotion recognition in children of parents with a mental illness.

Naomi Leona Werkmann, Arleta Angelika Luczejko, Klara Hagelweide, Rudolf Stark, Sarah Weigelt, Hanna Christiansen, Meinhard Kieser, Kathleen Otto, Corinna Reck, Ricarda Steinmayr and 4 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in psychiatry, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Naomi Leona WerkmannDepartment of Clinical Child and Adolescent Psychology, Justus Liebig University Giessen, Giessen, Germany.
Arleta Angelika LuczejkoDepartment of Clinical Child and Adolescent Psychology, Justus Liebig University Giessen, Giessen, Germany.
Klara HagelweideDepartment of Rehabilitation Sciences, Technical University Dortmund, Dortmund, Germany.
Rudolf StarkDepartment of Psychotherapy and Systems Neuroscience, Justus-Liebig University Giessen, Giessen, Germany.
Sarah WeigeltDepartment of Rehabilitation Sciences, Technical University Dortmund, Dortmund, Germany.
Hanna ChristiansenDepartment of Psychology, Clinical Child and Adolescent Psychology, Philipps University Marburg, Marburg, Germany.
Meinhard KieserInstitute of Medical Biometry, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany.
Kathleen OttoDepartment of Work and Organizational Psychology, Philipps-University Marburg, Marburg, Germany.
Corinna ReckDepartment of Psychology, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München, Munich, Germany.
Ricarda SteinmayrDepartment of Psychology, Technical University Dortmund, Dortmund, Germany.
Linda WirthweinDepartment of Psychology, Technical University Dortmund, Dortmund, Germany.
Anna-Lena ZietlowClinical Child and Adolescent Psychology, Department of Psychology, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany.
Christina SchwenckDepartment of Clinical Child and Adolescent Psychology, Justus Liebig University Giessen, Giessen, Germany.
COMPARE-family research group

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: Facial emotion recognition (FER) is a fundamental social skill essential for adaptive social behaviors, emotional development, and overall well-being. FER impairments have been linked to various mental disorders, making it a critical transdiagnostic mechanism influencing the development and trajectory of mental disorders. FER has also been found to play a role in the transgenerational transmission of mental disorders, with the majority of research suggesting FER impairments in children of parents with a mental illness (COPMI). Previous research primarily concentrated on COPMI of parents with internalizing disorders, which does not cover the full spectrum of outpatient mental health service populations. Furthermore, research focuses on varying components of FER by using different assessment paradigms, making it challenging to compare study results. To address these gaps, we comprehensively investigated FER abilities in COPMI using multiple tasks varying in task characteristics. Methods: We included 189 children, 77 COPMI and 112 children of parents without a diagnosed mental illness (COPWMI), aged 6 to 16 years. We assessed FER using three tasks with varying task demands: an emotional Go/NoGo task, a morphing task, and a task presenting short video sequences depicting different emotions. We fitted separate two-level hierarchical Bayesian models (to account for sibling pairs in our sample) for reaction times and accuracy rates for each task. Good model fit was assured by comparing models using varying priors. Results: Contrary to our expectations, our results revealed no general FER deficit in COPMI compared to COPWMI. The Bayesian models fitted for accuracy in the morphing task and Go/NoGo task yielded small yet significant effects. However, Bayes factors fitted for the models suggested that these effects could be due to random variations or noise in the data. Conclusions: Our study does not support FER impairments as a general feature of COPMI. Instead, individual factors, such as the type of parental disorder and the timing of its onset, may play a crucial role in influencing FER development. Future research should consider these factors, taking into account the diverse landscape of parental mental disorders.

Indexed as

children of parents with mental illness (COPMI)facial emotion recognitionmultimodal assessmentparents with mental illnesstransgenerational transmission of mental disorders

Identifiers

PMID38938463
PMCPMC11210522

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.