Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38938415›Full record

ReviewJournal of extracellular biology2023

Cellular communication through extracellular vesicles and lipid droplets.

Irumi Amarasinghe, William Phillips, Andrew F Hill, Lesley Cheng, Karla J Helbig, Eduard Willms, Ebony A Monson

Erratum issuedAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of extracellular biology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Irumi AmarasingheSchool of Agriculture, Biomedicine and Environment La Trobe University Melbourne Australia.
William PhillipsSchool of Agriculture, Biomedicine and Environment La Trobe University Melbourne Australia.
Andrew F HillInstitute for Health and Sport Victoria University Footscray Victoria Australia.
Lesley ChengSchool of Agriculture, Biomedicine and Environment La Trobe University Melbourne Australia.
Karla J HelbigSchool of Agriculture, Biomedicine and Environment La Trobe University Melbourne Australia.
Eduard WillmsSchool of Agriculture, Biomedicine and Environment La Trobe University Melbourne Australia.
Ebony A MonsonSchool of Agriculture, Biomedicine and Environment La Trobe University Melbourne Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cellular communication is essential for effective coordination of biological processes. One major form of intercellular communication occurs via the release of extracellular vesicles (EVs). These vesicles mediate intercellular communication through the transfer of their cargo and are actively explored for their role in various diseases and their potential therapeutic and diagnostic applications. Conversely, lipid droplets (LDs) are vesicles that transfer cargo within cells. Lipid droplets play roles in various diseases and evidence for their ability to transfer cargo between cells is emerging. To date, there has been little interdisciplinary research looking at the similarities and interactions between these two classes of small lipid vesicles. This review will compare the commonalities and differences between EVs and LDs including their biogenesis and secretion, isolation and characterisation methodologies, composition, and general heterogeneity and discuss challenges and opportunities in both fields.

Indexed as

cellular communicationextracellular vesicleslipid droplets

Identifiers

PMID38938415
PMCPMC11080893

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.