ArticleJACC. Advances2022
Risk Factors for Atrial Arrhythmias in Adults With Ebstein Anomaly.
Article in JACC. Advances, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- [Consensus recommendation of the Austrian Society of Cardiology: anatomy, pathophysiology, diagnosis and treatment of arrhythmias in adult patients with congenital heart disease].Wiener klinische Wochenschrift · 2026Review
- Catheter ablation of macro-reentrant atrial tachycardia in adults with Ebstein anomaly: A narrative review.Heart rhythm O2 · 2025Review
- Dysplasia of the tricuspid valve leading to recurrent atrial flutter and fibrillation: a case report.European heart journal. Case reports · 2025Article
- Electrophysiologic Considerations in Adult Patients with Ebstein's Anomaly.Journal of personalized medicine · 2024Review
- Ebstein's anomaly: an electrophysiological perspective.Journal of interventional cardiac electrophysiology : an international journal of arrhythmias and pacing · 2024Review
- Article
- A multidisciplinary approach to re-intervention in an Ebstein patient: a case report.European heart journal. Case reports · 2023Article
- Atrial Arrythmias in Ebstein Anomaly: A Common Clinical Conundrum.JACC. Advances · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Atrial arrhythmias (AA) are common in Ebstein anomaly (EA), but risk factors associated with AA are not well understood. Objectives: The purpose of this study was to determine the prevalence and risk factors for AA at baseline, incidence, and risk factors for AA during follow-up. Methods: Adults with EA receiving care at Mayo Clinic, MN, between 2003 and 2020 were included. AA was defined as atrial fibrillation (AF) or atrial flutter/tachycardia (AFL). Clinical, echocardiographic, rhythm, surgical data were collected. Results: Of 682 patients (aged 36 [24-49] years), 235 (34%) had AA at baseline (126 [18%] AF and 144 [21%] AFL), and the risk factors for AA were age, left and right atrial volume indexes, and reservoir strain. Among 447 patients without AA, 10-year cumulative incidence of AF and AFL was 16% and 22%, respectively. The risk factors for incident AF were older age and right atrial reservoir strain. The risk factors for incident AFL were atrial septal defect, left atrial volume index, and male sex. Among patients with baseline AA, 129 (40%) had recurrent episodes (AF 63 [20%], AFL 78 [24%]). The 5-year recurrence rate of AA was 34%, without significant difference for AF vs AFL (46% vs 27%, Conclusions: Patients with EA are at risk for incident and recurrent AA. AF was almost as common as AFL despite relatively young ages. Echocardiographic indexes of atrial function can identify at-risk patients, hence be used to improve risk stratification and guide therapy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.