Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38938389›Full record

ArticleJACC. Advances2022

Development and Validation of a Machine Learning Score for Readmissions After Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation.

Samian Sulaiman, Akram Kawsara, Abdulah Amr Mahayni, Abdullah El Sabbagh, Mandeep Singh, Juan Crestanello, Rajiv Gulati, Mohamad Alkhouli

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JACC. Advances, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Clinical Applications of Artificial Intelligence in Structural Heart Disease.Journal of the Society for Cardiovascular Angiography & Interventions · 2026
    Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Samian SulaimanDepartment of Cardiovascular Disease, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA.
Akram KawsaraDivision of Cardiology, West Virginia University, Morgantown, West Virginia, USA.
Abdulah Amr MahayniDepartment of Cardiovascular Disease, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA.
Abdullah El SabbaghDepartment of Cardiovascular Disease, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, Florida, USA.
Mandeep SinghDepartment of Cardiovascular Disease, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA.
Juan CrestanelloDepartment of Cardiac Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA.
Rajiv GulatiDepartment of Cardiovascular Disease, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA.
Mohamad AlkhouliDepartment of Cardiovascular Disease, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Identifying predictors of readmissions after transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) is an important unmet need. Objectives: We sought to explore the role of machine learning (ML) in predicting readmissions after TAVI. Methods: We included patients who underwent TAVI between 2016 and 2019 in the Nationwide Readmission Database. A total of 917 candidate predictors representing all International Classification of Diseases, Tenth Revision, diagnosis and procedure codes were included. First, we used lasso regression to remove noninformative variables and rank informative ones. Next, we used an unsupervised ML model (K-means) to identify patterns/clusters in the data. Furthermore, we used Light Gradient Boosting Machine and Shapley Additive exPlanations to specify the impact of individual predictors. Finally, we built a parsimonious model to predict 30-day readmission. Results: A total of 117,398 and 93,800 index TAVI hospitalizations were included in the 30- and 90-day analyses, respectively. Lasso regression identified 138 and 199 informative predictors for the 30- and 90-day readmission, respectively. Next, K-means recognized 2 distinct clusters: low risk and high risk. In the 30-day cohort, the readmission rate was 10.1% in the low risk group and 23.3% in the high risk group. In the 90-day cohort, the rates were 17.4% and 35.3%, respectively. The top predictors were the length of stay, frailty score, total discharge diagnoses, acute kidney injury, and Elixhauser score. These predictors were incorporated into a risk score (TAVI readmission score), which exhibited good performance in an external validation cohort (area under the curve 0.74 [0.7-0.78]). Conclusions: ML methods can leverage widely available administrative databases to identify patients at risk for readmission after TAVI, which could inform and improve post-TAVI care.

Indexed as

machine learningNational Readmission Databasereadmissiontranscatheter aortic valve implantation

Identifiers

PMID38938389
PMCPMC11198219

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.