Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38938387›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in medicine2024

Self-administered gerocognitive examination (SAGE) aids early detection of cognitive impairment at primary care provider visits.

Douglas W Scharre, Nicole E Vrettos, Haikady N Nagaraja, Randell K Wexler, Aaron D Clark, Christopher M Nguyen

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04063371 (Self-Administered Gerocognitive Examination), which is not on this map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04063371 completednot on this map

Self-Administered Gerocognitive Examination (SAGE) for the Early Detection of Cognitive Impairment at Primary Care Provider Visits

TypeobservationalSponsorOhio State UniversityRan2019 to 2020Enrolled300ConditionsCognitive ImpairmentArmsSelf-Administered Gerocognitive Examination (SAGE) or Electronic Self-Administered Gerocognitive Examination (eSAGE), Informant Conversation
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Douglas W ScharreDivision of Cognitive Neurology, Department of Neurology, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, OH, United States.
Nicole E VrettosDivision of Cognitive Neurology, Department of Neurology, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, OH, United States.
Haikady N NagarajaDivision of Biostatistics, College of Public Health, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, United States.
Randell K WexlerDepartment of Family and Community Medicine, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, OH, United States.
Aaron D ClarkDepartment of Family and Community Medicine, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, OH, United States.
Christopher M NguyenDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Health, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, OH, United States.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Current estimates indicate that up to 50-75% of dementia cases are undiagnosed at an early stage when treatments are most effective. Conducting robust accurate cognitive assessments can be time-consuming for providers and difficult to incorporate into a time-limited Primary Care Provider (PCP) visit. We wanted to compare PCP visits with and without using the self-administered SAGE to determine differences in identification rates of new cognitive disorders. Methods: Three hundred patients aged 65-89 without diagnosed cognitive disorders completing a non-acute office visit were enrolled (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT04063371). Two PCP offices conducted routine visits for 100 consecutive eligible patients each. One office used the SAGE in an additional 100 subjects and asked available informants about cognitive changes over the previous year. Chart reviews were conducted 60 days later. One-way analysis of variance and Fisher exact tests were used to compare the groups and outcomes. Results: When SAGE was utilized, the PCP documented the detection of new cognitive conditions/concerns six times (9% versus 1.5%) as often ( Discussion: SAGE was easily incorporated into PCP visits and significantly increased identification of new cognitive conditions/concerns leading to new diagnoses, treatment, or management changes. The detection rate increased 15-fold for those with impaired SAGE scores combined with informant reports.

Indexed as

early detectiongeriatric assessmentmild cognitive impairmentprimary care providerSAGEself-administered cognitive screening

Identifiers

PMID38938387
PMCPMC11208700

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.