ArticleJACC. Advances2023
Thoracic Aortic Aneurysm Risk Assessment: A Machine Learning Approach.
Article in JACC. Advances, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Intelligent imaging triage systems for reducing waiting anxiety: a narrative review.Frontiers in psychiatry · 2026Review
- Transport across the thoracic aortic wall: implications for aneurysm pathobiology, diagnosis, and treatment.American journal of physiology. Heart and circulatory physiology · 2025Review
- Revolutionizing Cardiology through Artificial Intelligence-Big Data from Proactive Prevention to Precise Diagnostics and Cutting-Edge Treatment-A Comprehensive Review of the Past 5 Years.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Review
- Beyond Aortic Diameter for the Management of Thoracic Aortic Aneurysm: Multidimensional Data for Multidisciplinary Discussion.JACC. Advances · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Traditional methods of risk assessment for thoracic aortic aneurysm (TAA) based on aneurysm size alone have been called into question as being unreliable in predicting complications. Biomechanical function of aortic tissue may be a better predictor of risk, but it is difficult to determine in vivo. Objectives: This study investigates using a machine learning (ML) model as a correlative measure of energy loss, a measure of TAA biomechanical function. Methods: Biaxial tensile testing was performed on resected TAA tissue collected from patients undergoing surgery. The energy loss of the tissue was calculated and used as the representative output. Input parameters were collected from clinical assessments including observations from medical scans and genetic paneling. Four ML algorithms including Gaussian process regression were trained in Matlab. Results: A total of 158 patients were considered (mean age 62 years, range 22-89 years, 78% male), including 11 healthy controls. The mean ascending aortic diameter was 47 ± 10 mm, with 46% having a bicuspid aortic valve. The best-performing model was found to give a greater correlative measure to energy loss (R Conclusions: A preliminary set of models demonstrated the ability of a ML algorithm to improve prediction of the mechanical function of TAA tissue. This model can use clinical data to provide additional information for risk stratification.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.