Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38938330›Full record

ArticleJACC. Advances2023

Predictors and Variation in Cardiac Rehabilitation Participation After Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement.

Devraj Sukul, Jeremy Albright, Michael P Thompson, Pedro Villablanca, Steven J Keteyian, Jessica Yaser, Duane Berkompas, Alphonse DeLucia, Himanshu S Patel, Stanley J Chetcuti and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JACC. Advances, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Observational
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Devraj SukulDivision of Cardiovascular Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA.
Jeremy AlbrightDivision of Cardiovascular Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA.
Michael P ThompsonInstitute for Healthcare Policy and Innovation, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA.
Pedro VillablancaDivision of Cardiovascular Medicine, Henry Ford Hospital, Detroit, Michigan, USA.
Steven J KeteyianDivision of Cardiovascular Medicine, Henry Ford Hospital, Detroit, Michigan, USA.
Jessica YaserDental Informatics, University of Michigan School of Dentistry, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA.
Duane BerkompasDivision of Cardiovascular Medicine, Corewell Health, Grand Rapids, Michigan, USA.
Alphonse DeLuciaDivision of Cardiothoracic Surgery, University of Michigan Health-West, Grand Rapids, Michigan, USA.
Himanshu S PatelDepartment of Cardiac Surgery, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA.
Stanley J ChetcutiDivision of Cardiovascular Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA.
P Michael GrossmanDivision of Cardiovascular Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Cardiac rehabilitation (CR) is strongly recommended for a spectrum of cardiovascular conditions and procedures including aortic valve replacement. Objectives: The purpose of this study was to characterize patient and hospital factors associated with CR participation after transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) and determine which factors explain hospital-level variation in CR participation. Methods: We linked clinical and administrative claims data from patients who underwent TAVR at 24 Michigan hospitals between January 1, 2016 and June 30, 2020 and obtained rates of CR enrollment within 90 days of discharge. Sequential mixed models were fit to evaluate hospital variation in 90-day post-TAVR CR participation. Results: Among 3,372 patients, 30.6% participated in CR within 90-days after discharge. Several patient factors were negatively associated with CR participation after TAVR including older age, Medicaid insurance, atrial fibrillation/flutter, dialysis use, and slower baseline 5-m walk times. There was substantial hospital variation in CR participation after TAVR ranging from 5% to 60% across 24 hospitals. Patient case mix did not explain hospital variation in CR across hospitals with median OR numerically increasing from 2.11 (95% CI: 1.62-2.67) to 2.13 (95% CI: 1.61-2.68) after accounting for patient-level factors. Conclusions: Less than 1 in 3 patients who underwent TAVR in Michigan participated in CR within 90-days of discharge. Although several patient factors are associated with CR participation, hospital-level variation in CR participation after TAVR is not explained by patient case mix. Identifying hospital processes of care that promote CR participation after TAVR will be critical to improving CR participation after TAVR.

Indexed as

cardiac rehabilitationhealth services researchhospital variationTAVR

Identifiers

PMID38938330
PMCPMC11198261

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.