ArticleJACC. Advances2023
Outcomes and Discriminatory Accuracy of the CHA
Article in JACC. Advances, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- Prevalence, Incidence, and Impact of Cancer in Atrial Fibrillation: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of 70,000,000 Patients.Health science reports · 2026Review
- Addition of malignancy into the CHADS2/CHA2DS2VASc score: better prediction of stroke risk in individuals with cancer and atrial fibrillation.Cardio-oncology (London, England) · 2026Article
- Patient-centered outcomes according to cancer status in cardiac surgery patients: a population-based cohort study.British journal of cancer · 2026Observational
- Atrial fibrillation and ischemic stroke in cancer: the latest scientific evidence, current management, and future directions.Journal of thrombosis and thrombolysis · 2025Review
- Long-term risks and benefits of oral anticoagulation in atrial fibrillation patients with cancer: A report from the GLORIA-AF registry.European journal of clinical investigation · 2025Article
- Anticoagulation in Patients With Cancer.JACC. Case reports · 2024Article
- Caught Between a Rock and a Hard Place: Anticoagulation in Atrial Fibrillation Patients With Cancer.JACC. Advances · 2023Article
- Cancer, Inflammation, and Thrombosis: Drivers of Atrial Fibrillation in Oncology Patients.Clinical and applied thrombosis/hemostasis : official journal of the International Academy of Clinical and Applied Thrombosis/HemostasisReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Atrial fibrillation (AF) is highly prevalent among cancer patients. The role of traditional risk stratification scores in the context of different cancer types in these patients remains unknown. Objectives: The purpose of this study was to determine the discriminative accuracy of the CHA Methods: The National Readmission Database (2015-2019) was used to identify all AF patients stratified by the cancer diagnosis, type, and CHA Results: A total of 6,996,088 AF patients were identified at index admission. Of these, 4,242,630 (642,237 cancer, 3,600,393 noncancer) were readmitted at 30 days. Cancer patients (92.1%) had a higher proportion of high CHA Conclusions: Cancer patients with AF are at a higher risk of readmission and major bleeding. The risk of ischemic stroke during readmission appears to be lower than noncancer patients. These findings may have implications for anticoagulant therapy in cancer patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.