ArticleJACC. Advances2023
Congenital Cardiac Catheterization in Low- and Middle-Income Countries: The International Quality Improvement Collaborative Catheterization Registry.
Article in JACC. Advances, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Health-Related Quality of Life, Challenges, and Experiences of Patients With Congenital Heart Disease After Cardiac Catheterization: A Mixed-Methods Study.Journal of the Society for Cardiovascular Angiography & Interventions · 2025Article
- Congenital heart disease cardiac catheterization at Uganda Heart Institute, a 12-year retrospective study of immediate outcomes.BMC cardiovascular disorders · 2024Article
- Outcomes Comparisons Based on Gross National Income: Problems Without Borders?JACC. Advances · 2023Article
- Trends in procedural closure of patent ductus arteriosus among children from 2011 to 2022 in Japan.Pediatrics international : official journal of the Japan Pediatric SocietyArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: No published data are available on the patient, procedural characteristics, and outcomes of congenital heart disease (CHD) cardiac catheterization performed in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). Objectives: The objective of this study was to describe procedural characteristics and patient outcomes of CHD cardiac catheterizations in LMICs. Methods: Cases performed between January 2019 and December 2020 from 15 centers in the International Quality Improvement Collaborative Congenital Heart Disease Catheterization Registry (IQIC-CHDCR) data were included. The Procedural Risk in Congenital Cardiac Catheterization (PREDIC3T) classification was used to stratify risk. Outcomes of interest included mortality, severe adverse events (SAEs), and procedural efficacy. Procedural efficacy, based on technical and safety endpoints, was categorized into optimal, adequate, and inadequate for 5 common interventional procedures. Results: There were 3,287 cases, of which 60% (n = 1,973) were interventional cases. Most of the cases (66%) were in patients between the ages of 1 to 18 years with a median patient age of 4 years. PREDIC3T risk class 1 and 2 were most common in 37% and 38% of cases, respectively. SAEs occurred in 2.8% while the death was reported within <72 hours post catheterization 1%. The majority of device implantation procedures patent ductus arteriosus (67%) and atrial septal defect (60%) had optimal procedure efficacy outcomes. Conclusions: This study demonstrates that congenital cardiac catheterization is safely performed in LMICs. Future work addressing predictors of SAEs and adverse procedural outcomes may help future quality improvement initiatives.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.