Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38938222›Full record

ArticleClinical anatomy (New York, N.Y.)2025

Using design thinking to create and implement a 3D digital library of anatomical specimens.

Morgan Titmus, Beatriz Ir de Oliveira, Paul Ellery, Gary Whittaker, Hannah Radley, Milo Radunski, Leo Ng, Petra Helmholz, Zhonghua Sun

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical anatomy (New York, N.Y.), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Morgan TitmusCurtin Medical School, Curtin University, Bentley, Western Australia, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9553-6841
Beatriz Ir de OliveiraCurtin School of Allied Health, Curtin University, Bentley, Western Australia, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8770-5075
Paul ElleryCurtin Medical School, Curtin University, Bentley, Western Australia, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3124-8397
Gary WhittakerCurtin Medical School, Curtin University, Bentley, Western Australia, Australia.
Hannah RadleyCurtin Medical School, Curtin University, Bentley, Western Australia, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3803-7314
Milo RadunskiCurtin Medical School, Curtin University, Bentley, Western Australia, Australia.
Leo NgSchool of Health Science, Swinburne University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9814-0495
Petra HelmholzSchool of Earth and Planetary Sciences, Curtin University, Bentley, Western Australia, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9894-3119
Zhonghua SunCurtin Medical School, Curtin University, Bentley, Western Australia, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7538-4761

Funding

Curtin AcademyCurtin Medical SchoolCurtin School of Allied Health
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Design thinking (DT) is a five-stage process (empathize, define, ideate, prototype, and test) that guides the creation of user-centered solutions to complex problems. DT is in common use outside of science but has rarely been applied to anatomical education. The use of DT in this study identified the need for flexible access to anatomical specimens outside of the anatomy laboratory and guided the creation of a digital library of three-dimensional (3D) anatomical specimens (3D Anatomy Viewer). To test whether the resource was fit for purpose, a mixed-methods student evaluation was undertaken. Student surveys (n = 46) were employed using the system usability scale (SUS) and an unvalidated acceptability questionnaire. These verified that 3D Anatomy Viewer was usable (SUS of 72%) and acceptable (agreement range of 77%-93% on all Likert-type survey statements, Cronbach's alpha = 0.929). Supplementary interviews (n = 5) were analyzed through content analysis and revealed three main themes: (1) a credible online supplementary learning resource; (2) learning anatomy with 3D realism and interactivity; (3) user recommendations for expanding the number of anatomical models, test questions, and gamification elements. These data demonstrate that a DT framework can be successfully applied to anatomical education for creation of a practical learning resource. Anatomy educators should consider employing a DT framework where student-centered solutions to learner needs are required.

Indexed as

AnatomyImaging, Three-DimensionalLibraries, DigitalModels, AnatomicHumansSurveys and Questionnaires3D visualizationanatomy visualisationcadaverdesign thinkingdigital technologylearning resourcephotogrammetrystudent‐centered

Identifiers

PMID38938222
PMCPMC12005699

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.