Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38937923›Full record

SynthesisJournal of medical radiation sciences2024

Systematic review of MRI safety literature in relation to radiofrequency thermal injury prevention.

Cassandra Baker, Barbara Nugent, David Grainger, Johnathan Hewis, Christina Malamateniou

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Journal of medical radiation sciences, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Assessment of MR-Induced Heating Effects in Four Common Veterinary Implants at 1.5 and 3.0 T: A Phantom Study.Veterinary radiology & ultrasound : the official journal of the American College of Veterinary Radiology and the International Veterinary Radiology Association · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Cassandra BakerQscan Radiology, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0007-9037-4856
Barbara NugentDivision of Midwifery and Radiography, Department of Radiography, City University of London School of Health & Psychological Sciences, London, UK.
David GraingerMedicines and Healthcare Products Regulatory Agency, London, UK.
Johnathan HewisSchool of Dentistry and Medical Sciences, Charles Sturt University, Port Macquarie, New South Wales, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7810-5641
Christina MalamateniouDivision of Midwifery and Radiography, Department of Radiography, City University of London School of Health & Psychological Sciences, London, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2352-8575

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionMagnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is a rapidly evolving modality, generally considered safe due to lack of ionising radiation. While MRI technology and techniques are improving, many of the safety concerns remain the same as when first established. Patient thermal injuries are the most frequently reported adverse event, accounting for 59% of MRI incidents to the Food and Drug Administration (FDA). Surveys indicate many incidents remain unreported. Patient thermal injuries are preventable and various methods for their mitigation have been published. However, recommendations can be variable, fragmented and confusing. The aim of this systematic review was to synthesise the evidence on MRI safety and associated skin injuries and offer comprehensive recommendations for radiographers to prevent skin thermal injuries.

methodsFour journal databases were searched for sources published January 2010-May 2023, presenting information on MRI safety and thermal injuries.

resultsOf 26,801 articles returned, after careful screening and based on the eligibility criteria, only 79 articles and an additional 19 grey literature sources were included (n = 98). Included studies were examined using thematic analysis to determine if holistic recommendations can be provided to assist in preventing skin burns. This resulted in three simplified recommendations: Remove any electrically conductive items Insulate the patient to prevent any conductive loops or contact with objects Communicate regularly

conclusionBy implementing the above recommendations, it is estimated that 97% of skin burns could be prevented. With thermal injuries continuing to impact MRI safety, strategies to prevent skin burns and heating are essential. Assessing individual risks, rather than blanket policies, will help prevent skin thermal injuries occurring, improving patient care.

Indexed as

BurnsMagnetic Resonance ImagingHumansPatient SafetyRadio WavesAdverse eventsmagnetic resonance imagingphysicsradiographerresearch – systematic review

Identifiers

PMID38937923
PMCPMC11569411

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.