Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38937734›Full record

ArticleBMC public health2024

"Put your personality into the call": A qualitative interview study illuminating strategies for improving men's engagement on crisis helplines.

Katherine Trail, Kieran O'Gorman, Zac Seidler, John Oliffe, Tara Hunt, Simon Rice

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC public health, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Katherine TrailOrygen, Parkville, Melbourne, Australia.
Kieran O'GormanOrygen, Parkville, Melbourne, Australia.
Zac SeidlerOrygen, Parkville, Melbourne, Australia.
John OliffeSchool of Nursing, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada.
Tara HuntLifeline Research Foundation, Lifeline Australia, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
Simon RiceOrygen, Parkville, Melbourne, Australia. simon.rice@movember.com.

Funding

Australian Government Medical Research Future Fund APP1199972
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCrisis telephone helplines are an integral part of community suicide prevention. Despite high male suicide rates, men's experiences of these services are poorly understood. The current study explored men's perspectives of their interactions with helpline counsellors to understand how their engagement on helplines can be enhanced.

methodSixteen men (19-71 years) who had previously used a mental health or crisis helpline in Australia completed individual semi-structured interviews about their experiences. Data were analysed using interpretive descriptive methodologies.

resultsTwo themes derived from the data related to how men engaged with counsellors on helpline services. First, men emphasized the importance of helpline counsellors creating and maintaining an authentic connection across the call, providing suggestions for strategies to secure connection. Second, men discussed how counsellors can facilitate outcomes through offering space for their narratives and aiding in referrals to other support services when required.

conclusionsFindings highlight the value of crisis helplines for men's suicide prevention services while identifying target areas to improve engagement. We discuss implications for the findings including suggestions for gender-sensitive care within crisis helplines.

Indexed as

HotlinesQualitative ResearchSuicide PreventionAdultAgedAustraliaCrisis InterventionHumansInterviews as TopicMaleMiddle AgedYoung AdultCrisis interventionMasculinitiesMen’s healthService engagementSuicide preventionTelephone crisis helpline

Identifiers

PMID38937734
PMCPMC11212170

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.