Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38937683›Full record

ArticleBMC plant biology2024

Determination of anthracnose (Colletotrichum fructicola) resistance mechanism using transcriptome analysis of resistant and susceptible pear (Pyrus pyrifolia).

Xiaomei Tang, Fen Lu, Ziwen Xiao, Yue Wang, Guoqing Hu, Kexin Cai, Ruichang Yin, Wei Song, Luoluo Xie, Guoling Guo and 8 more

Abstract read
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in BMC plant biology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

18 authors.

Xiaomei Tang *Anhui Province Key Laboratory of Horticultural Crop Quality Biology, School of Horticulture, Anhui Agricultural University, Hefei, 230036, China.
Fen Lu *Anhui Province Key Laboratory of Horticultural Crop Quality Biology, School of Horticulture, Anhui Agricultural University, Hefei, 230036, China.
Ziwen XiaoAnhui Province Key Laboratory of Horticultural Crop Quality Biology, School of Horticulture, Anhui Agricultural University, Hefei, 230036, China.
Yue WangAnhui Province Key Laboratory of Horticultural Crop Quality Biology, School of Horticulture, Anhui Agricultural University, Hefei, 230036, China.
Guoqing HuAnhui Province Key Laboratory of Horticultural Crop Quality Biology, School of Horticulture, Anhui Agricultural University, Hefei, 230036, China.
Kexin CaiAnhui Province Key Laboratory of Horticultural Crop Quality Biology, School of Horticulture, Anhui Agricultural University, Hefei, 230036, China.
Ruichang YinAnhui Province Key Laboratory of Horticultural Crop Quality Biology, School of Horticulture, Anhui Agricultural University, Hefei, 230036, China.
Wei SongAnhui Province Key Laboratory of Horticultural Crop Quality Biology, School of Horticulture, Anhui Agricultural University, Hefei, 230036, China.
Luoluo XieAnhui Province Key Laboratory of Horticultural Crop Quality Biology, School of Horticulture, Anhui Agricultural University, Hefei, 230036, China.
Guoling GuoAnhui Province Key Laboratory of Horticultural Crop Quality Biology, School of Horticulture, Anhui Agricultural University, Hefei, 230036, China.
Wenming WangSation of Science and Technology of Shexian, Huangshan, Anhui Province, China.
Lun LiuAnhui Province Key Laboratory of Horticultural Crop Quality Biology, School of Horticulture, Anhui Agricultural University, Hefei, 230036, China.
Li LiuAnhui Province Key Laboratory of Horticultural Crop Quality Biology, School of Horticulture, Anhui Agricultural University, Hefei, 230036, China.
Zhenfeng YeAnhui Province Key Laboratory of Horticultural Crop Quality Biology, School of Horticulture, Anhui Agricultural University, Hefei, 230036, China.
Wei HengAnhui Province Key Laboratory of Horticultural Crop Quality Biology, School of Horticulture, Anhui Agricultural University, Hefei, 230036, China.
Xianping GuoInstitute of Horticulture, Henan Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Zhengzhou, Henan Province, 450002, China.
Dongsheng WangInstitute of Horticulture, Henan Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Zhengzhou, Henan Province, 450002, China. wdse66@126.com.
Bing JiaAnhui Province Key Laboratory of Horticultural Crop Quality Biology, School of Horticulture, Anhui Agricultural University, Hefei, 230036, China. jb1977@ahau.edu.cn.

Funding

Anhui Agricultural University Talent Project rc322105 and K2132002National Natural Science Foundation of China 32302484the China Agriculture Research System CARS-28-14the China Agriculture Research System CARS-28-39This project was supported by the Key Research Project of Natural Science in Colleges and Universities of the Anhui Provincial Department of Education 2022AHO50926
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAnthracnose, mainly caused by Colletotrichum fructicola, leads to severe losses in pear production. However, there is limited information available regarding the molecular response to anthracnose in pears.

resultsIn this study, the anthracnose-resistant variety 'Seli' and susceptible pear cultivar 'Cuiguan' were subjected to transcriptome analysis following C. fructicola inoculation at 6 and 24 h using RNA sequencing. A total of 3186 differentially expressed genes were detected in 'Seli' and 'Cuiguan' using Illumina sequencing technology. Gene Ontology and Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes pathway analyses indicated that the transcriptional response of pears to C. fructicola infection included responses to reactive oxygen species, phytohormone signaling, phenylpropanoid biosynthesis, and secondary metabolite biosynthetic processes. Moreover, the mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) signaling pathway and phenylpropanoid biosynthesis were involved in the defense of 'Seli'. Furthermore, the gene coexpression network data showed that genes related to plant-pathogen interactions were associated with C. fructicola resistance in 'Seli' at the early stage.

conclusionOur results showed that the activation of specific genes in MAPK, calcium signaling pathways and phenylpropanoid biosynthesis was highly related to C. fructicola resistance in 'Seli' and providing several potential candidate genes for breeding anthracnose-resistant pear varieties.

Indexed as

ColletotrichumDisease ResistanceGene Expression ProfilingPlant DiseasesPyrusGene Expression Regulation, PlantTranscriptomeCalcium signalingColletotrichum fructicolaDisease resistanceMAPK signalingPearRNA sequencing

Identifiers

PMID38937683
PMCPMC11212231

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.