Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38937662›Full record

ArticleGenetics, selection, evolution : GSE2024

Allele-specific binding variants causing ChIP-seq peak height of histone modification are not enriched in expression QTL annotations.

Mohammad Ghoreishifar, Amanda J Chamberlain, Ruidong Xiang, Claire P Prowse-Wilkins, Thomas J Lopdell, Mathew D Littlejohn, Jennie E Pryce, Michael E Goddard

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Genetics, selection, evolution : GSE, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Integrating extensive functional annotations and multiomics of cattle enhances climate resilience prediction and mapping.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Mohammad GhoreishifarAgriculture Victoria Research, AgriBio Centre for AgriBioscience, Bundoora, VIC, 3083, Australia. mohammad.ghoreishifar@agriculture.vic.gov.au.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5638-6585
Amanda J ChamberlainAgriculture Victoria Research, AgriBio Centre for AgriBioscience, Bundoora, VIC, 3083, Australia.
Ruidong XiangAgriculture Victoria Research, AgriBio Centre for AgriBioscience, Bundoora, VIC, 3083, Australia.
Claire P Prowse-WilkinsAgriculture Victoria Research, AgriBio Centre for AgriBioscience, Bundoora, VIC, 3083, Australia.
Thomas J LopdellResearch and Development, Livestock Improvement Corporation, Private Bag 3016, Hamilton, 3240, New Zealand.
Mathew D LittlejohnResearch and Development, Livestock Improvement Corporation, Private Bag 3016, Hamilton, 3240, New Zealand.
Jennie E PryceAgriculture Victoria Research, AgriBio Centre for AgriBioscience, Bundoora, VIC, 3083, Australia.
Michael E GoddardAgriculture Victoria Research, AgriBio Centre for AgriBioscience, Bundoora, VIC, 3083, Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundGenome sequence variants affecting complex traits (quantitative trait loci, QTL) are enriched in functional regions of the genome, such as those marked by certain histone modifications. These variants are believed to influence gene expression. However, due to the linkage disequilibrium among nearby variants, pinpointing the precise location of QTL is challenging. We aimed to identify allele-specific binding (ASB) QTL (asbQTL) that cause variation in the level of histone modification, as measured by the height of peaks assayed by ChIP-seq (chromatin immunoprecipitation sequencing). We identified DNA sequences that predict the difference between alleles in ChIP-seq peak height in H3K4me3 and H3K27ac histone modifications in the mammary glands of cows.

resultsWe used a gapped k-mer support vector machine, a novel best linear unbiased prediction model, and a multiple linear regression model that combines the other two approaches to predict variant impacts on peak height. For each method, a subset of 1000 sites with the highest magnitude of predicted ASB was considered as candidate asbQTL. The accuracy of this prediction was measured by the proportion where the predicted direction matched the observed direction. Prediction accuracy ranged between 0.59 and 0.74, suggesting that these 1000 sites are enriched for asbQTL. Using independent data, we investigated functional enrichment in the candidate asbQTL set and three control groups, including non-causal ASB sites, non-ASB variants under a peak, and SNPs (single nucleotide polymorphisms) not under a peak. For H3K4me3, a higher proportion of the candidate asbQTL were confirmed as ASB when compared to the non-causal ASB sites (P < 0.01). However, these candidate asbQTL did not enrich for the other annotations, including expression QTL (eQTL), allele-specific expression QTL (aseQTL) and sites conserved across mammals (P > 0.05).

conclusionsWe identified putatively causal sites for asbQTL using the DNA sequence surrounding these sites. Our results suggest that many sites influencing histone modifications may not directly affect gene expression. However, it is important to acknowledge that distinguishing between putative causal ASB sites and other non-causal ASB sites in high linkage disequilibrium with the causal sites regarding their impact on gene expression may be challenging due to limitations in statistical power.

Indexed as

AllelesChromatin Immunoprecipitation SequencingHistonesQuantitative Trait LociAnimalsCattleFemaleHistone CodeLinkage DisequilibriumMolecular Sequence AnnotationPolymorphism, Single NucleotideHistones

Identifiers

PMID38937662
PMCPMC11212393

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.