Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38937624›Full record

Trial reportNature cancer2024

Clinical implementation of artificial-intelligence-assisted detection of breast cancer metastases in sentinel lymph nodes: the CONFIDENT-B single-center, non-randomized clinical trial.

C van Dooijeweert, R N Flach, N D Ter Hoeve, C P H Vreuls, R Goldschmeding, J E Freund, P Pham, T Q Nguyen, E van der Wall, G W J Frederix and 2 more

Erratum issuedAbstract readClinical Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Nature cancer, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 22 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Preclinical models in the study of lymph node metastasis.Journal of Zhejiang University. Science. B · 2025
    Review
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

C van DooijeweertDepartment of Pathology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands. c.vandooijeweert-3@umcutrecht.nl.ORCID 0000-0001-8030-4335
R N FlachDepartment of Pathology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
N D Ter HoeveDepartment of Pathology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-3317-8855
C P H VreulsDepartment of Pathology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
R GoldschmedingDepartment of Pathology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
J E FreundDepartment of Pathology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
P PhamDepartment of Pathology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
T Q NguyenDepartment of Pathology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
E van der WallDepartment of Medical Oncology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
G W J FrederixDepartment of Epidemiology and Health Economics, Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
N StathonikosDepartment of Pathology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-5457-7580
P J van DiestDepartment of Pathology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands. p.j.vandiest@umcutrecht.nl.ORCID 0000-0003-0658-2745

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Pathologists' assessment of sentinel lymph nodes (SNs) for breast cancer (BC) metastases is a treatment-guiding yet labor-intensive and costly task because of the performance of immunohistochemistry (IHC) in morphologically negative cases. This non-randomized, single-center clinical trial (International Standard Randomized Controlled Trial Number:14323711) assessed the efficacy of an artificial intelligence (AI)-assisted workflow for detecting BC metastases in SNs while maintaining diagnostic safety standards. From September 2022 to May 2023, 190 SN specimens were consecutively enrolled and allocated biweekly to the intervention arm (n = 100) or control arm (n = 90). In both arms, digital whole-slide images of hematoxylin-eosin sections of SN specimens were assessed by an expert pathologist, who was assisted by the 'Metastasis Detection' app (Visiopharm) in the intervention arm. Our primary endpoint showed a significantly reduced adjusted relative risk of IHC use (0.680, 95% confidence interval: 0.347-0.878) for AI-assisted pathologists, with subsequent cost savings of ~3,000 €. Secondary endpoints showed significant time reductions and up to 30% improved sensitivity for AI-assisted pathologists. This trial demonstrates the safety and potential for cost and time savings of AI assistance.

Indexed as

Artificial IntelligenceBreast NeoplasmsLymphatic MetastasisSentinel Lymph NodeAdultAgedFemaleHumansImmunohistochemistryMiddle AgedSentinel Lymph Node Biopsy

Identifiers

PMID38937624
PMCPMC11358151

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.