ArticleScientific reports2024
Evaluating the low-rank coal degradation efficiency bioaugmented with activated sludge.
Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Recent progress on the biological degradation and solubilization of coal.Biodegradation · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Microbial bioaugmentation of coal is considered as a viable and ecologically sustainable approach for the utilization of low-rank coals (LRC). The search for novel techniques to derive high-value products from LRC is currently of great importance. In response to this demand, endeavors have been undertaken to develop microbially based coal solubilization and degradation techniques. The impact of supplementing activated sludge (AS) as a microbial augmentation to enhance LRC biodegradation was investigated in this study. The LRC and their biodegradation products were characterized using the following methods: excitation-emission Matrices detected fluorophores at specific wavelength positions (O, E, and K peaks), revealing the presence of organic complexes with humic properties. FTIR indicated the increased amount of carboxyl groups in the bioaugmented coals, likely due to aerobic oxidation of peripheral non-aromatic structural components of coal. The bacterial communities of LRC samples are primarily composed of Actinobacteria (up to 36.2%) and Proteobacteria (up to 25.8%), whereas the Firmicutes (63.04%) was the most abundant phylum for AS. The community-level physiological profile analysis showed that the microbial community AS had high metabolic activity of compared to those of coal. Overall, the results demonstrated successful stimulation of LRC transformation through supplementation of exogenous microflora in the form of AS.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.