Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38937494›Full record

ArticleNature communications2024

Perfect linear optics using silicon photonics.

Miltiadis Moralis-Pegios, George Giamougiannis, Apostolos Tsakyridis, David Lazovsky, Nikos Pleros

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature communications, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. A 3.584 Tbps coherent receiver chip on InP-LiNbOLight, science & applications · 2025
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Miltiadis Moralis-Pegios *Department of Informatics, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, 54124, Thessaloniki, Greece. mmoralis@csd.auth.gr.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9401-730X
George Giamougiannis *Department of Informatics, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, 54124, Thessaloniki, Greece.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6406-9723
Apostolos TsakyridisDepartment of Informatics, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, 54124, Thessaloniki, Greece.
David LazovskyCelestial AI, 2962 Bunker Hill Ln, Suite 200, Santa Clara, CA, 95054, USA.
Nikos PlerosDepartment of Informatics, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, 54124, Thessaloniki, Greece.

Funding

European Commission (EC) 101120938European Commission (EC) 779664European Commission (EC) 871391
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Recently there has been growing interest in using photonics to perform the linear algebra operations of neuromorphic and quantum computing applications, aiming at harnessing silicon photonics' (SiPho) high-speed and energy-efficiency credentials. Accurately mapping, however, a matrix into optics remains challenging, since state-of-the-art optical architectures are sensitive to fabrication imperfections. This leads to reduced fidelity that degrades as the insertion losses of the optical matrix nodes or the matrix dimensions increase. In this work, we present the experimental deployment of a 4 × 4 coherent crossbar (Xbar) as a silicon chip and validate experimentally its theoretically predicted fidelity restoration credentials. We demonstrate the experimental implementation of 10,000 arbitrary linear transformations achieving a record-high fidelity of 99.997% ± 0.002, limited mainly by the measurement equipment. Our work represents an integrated optical circuit providing almost unity and loss-independent fidelity in the realization of arbitrary matrices, highlighting light's credentials in resolving complex computations.

Identifiers

PMID38937494
PMCPMC11211446

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.