Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38937476›Full record

ArticleNPJ breast cancer2024

Contextual and individual inequalities in breast cancer screening participation and outcomes in Turin (North-West Italy).

Chiara Di Girolamo, Giulio Cammarata, Livia Giordano, Nicolás Zengarini, Elisa Ferracin, Viviana Vergini, Gianluigi Ferrante, Fulvio Ricceri

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in NPJ breast cancer, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Chiara Di GirolamoCentre for Biostatistics, Epidemiology, and Public Health (C-BEPH) - Department of Clinical and Biological Sciences, University of Turin, Regione Gonzole 10, 10043 Orbassano, Turin, Italy.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6031-1009
Giulio CammarataCluster Reply - Via Cardinale Massaia 83, 10147, Turin, Italy.
Livia GiordanoSSD Epidemiologia Screening - CRPT, AOU Città della Salute e della Scienza di Torino, Corso Bramante 88, 10126, Turin, Italy.
Nicolás ZengariniEpidemiology Department, Local Health Unit TO3, Via Sabaudia, 164, 10095, Grugliasco, Italy.
Elisa FerracinEpidemiology Department, Local Health Unit TO3, Via Sabaudia, 164, 10095, Grugliasco, Italy.
Viviana VerginiSSD Epidemiologia Screening - CRPT, AOU Città della Salute e della Scienza di Torino, Corso Bramante 88, 10126, Turin, Italy.
Gianluigi Ferrante *SSD Epidemiologia Screening - CRPT, AOU Città della Salute e della Scienza di Torino, Corso Bramante 88, 10126, Turin, Italy. gianluigi.ferrante@cpo.it.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0182-4506
Fulvio Ricceri *Centre for Biostatistics, Epidemiology, and Public Health (C-BEPH) - Department of Clinical and Biological Sciences, University of Turin, Regione Gonzole 10, 10043 Orbassano, Turin, Italy.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8749-9737

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Breast cancer incidence and screening participation exhibit an unequal distribution in the population. This study aims to investigate the impact of socioeconomic position (SEP) on three breast screening indicators (participation, recall, and cancer detection rates) among women aged 50-69 in the city of Turin between 2010 and 2019. The study also aims to determine whether contextual factors (deprivation index) or individual factors (educational level) have a greater influence. The data used in this study are sourced from the Turin Breast Screening Program (TBSP) and the Turin Longitudinal Study (TLS). To test the hypothesis and account for the hierarchical structure of the data, multilevel models were used. Both contextual and individual SEP were found to be associated with screening participation. Participation increased with higher levels of deprivation (odds ratio for most deprived: 1.13; 95% CI 1.11-1.16) and decreased with higher educational levels (OR for low educated: 1.37; 95% CI 1.34-1.40). Contextual SEP did not show any association with recall or cancer detection rates, but individual SEP had an impact. Women with lower educational levels had a statistically significant 19% lower odds of being recalled and a statistically significant 20% lower odds of being diagnosed with cancer. Additionally, immigrant women were less likely to participate in screening, be recalled, or receive a cancer diagnosis. Educational level consistently influenced the analyzed screening indicators, while contextual deprivation appeared to have less importance. It is likely that women living in less deprived areas and with higher education have greater access to opportunistic screening.

Identifiers

PMID38937476
PMCPMC11211318

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.